Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 27;15(5):R90. doi: 10.1186/bcr3486

Table 4.

Breast cancer-specific mortality associated with the ER/PR/HER2 score

ER/PR/HER2 score a Number of women Number of deaths Adjusted HR (95% CI)
Model 1 b Model 2 c
Women with ER-negative invasive breast cancer
 
Overall
 
 
 
 
  < 0
60
15
Referent
Referent
 0
337
103
1.32 (0.76 to 2.32)
1.30 (0.74 to 2.28)
  > 0
109
39
1.43 (0.77 to 2.69)
1.43 (0.76 to 2.67)
 Trend
 
 
Ptrend = 0.30
Ptrend = 0.29
White women
 
 
 
 
  < 0
35
9
Referent
Referent
 0
162
46
1.20 (0.55 to 2.62)
1.09 (0.48 to 2.45)
  > 0
54
14
1.16 (0.46 to 2.90)
1.09 (0.43 to 2.76)
 Trend
 
 
Ptrend = 0.79
Ptrend = 0.88
Black women
 
 
 
 
  < 0
25
6
Referent
Referent
 0
175
57
1.46 (0.59 to 3.61)
1.47 (0.60 to 3.64)
  > 0
55
25
1.57 (0.61 to 4.06)
1.55 (0.60 to 4.03)
 Trend
 
 
Ptrend = 0.42
Ptrend = 0.45
Homogeneity of trends between white women and black women
Phomogeneity = 0.36
Phomogeneity = 0.32
Women with ER-positive invasive breast cancer
Quartiles of ER/PR/HER2 scored
 
 
 
 
Overall
 
 
 
 
 Q1
175
18
Referent
Referent
 Q2
177
22
1.27 (0.65 to 2.45)
1.39 (0.71 to 2.70)
 Q3
172
33
2.04 (1.10 to 3.81)
2.00 (1.07 to 3.76)
 Q4
174
42
2.71 (1.48 to 4.95)
2.48 (1.36 to 4.55)
 Trend
 
 
Ptrend = 0.0002
Ptrend = 0.001
White women
 
 
 
 
 Q1
118
9
Referent
Referent
 Q2
105
10
1.41 (0.53 to 3.74)
1.37 (0.52 to 3.62)
 Q3
113
20
2.03 (0.84 to 4.92)
1.98 (0.82 to 4.78)
 Q4
94
23
2.77 (1.19 to 6.45)
2.62 (1.12 to 6.11)
 Trend
 
 
Ptrend = 0.01
Ptrend = 0.01
Black women
 
 
 
 
 Q1
57
9
Referent
Referent
 Q2
72
12
1.32 (0.50 to 3.51)
1.60 (0.58 to 4.45)
 Q3
59
13
2.34 (0.85 to 6.42)
2.34 (0.83 to 6.55)
 Q4
80
19
3.43 (1.33 to 8.84)
2.88 (1.08 to 7.67)
 Trend
 
 
Ptrend = 0.006
Ptrend = 0.03
Homogeneity of trends between white women and black women Phomogeneity = 0.56 Phomogeneity = 0.32

CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hazard ratio; PR, progesterone receptor.

aER/PR/HER2 score = 94.7 × (–0.100 ER10 – 0.079 PR10 + 0.586 HER2); the range of ER/PR/HER2 scores was –71.07 to 55.49 in women with ER-negative tumor and –141.10 to 53.92 in women with ER-positive tumor.

bMultivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models using age (in days) as the time metric stratified by age (in years) and adjusted for race (white, black), study site (Detroit, Los Angeles), tumor stage (localized, non-localized).

cAdditionally adjusted for histologic grade (low, intermediate, high); low and intermediate were combined into a single category in analyses for women with ER-negative tumors due to a small number of women with a low grade.

dQuartiles of ER/PR/HER2 scores in all women with ER-positive tumors were Q1 (–141.10 to –97.33), Q2 (–97.32 to –68.98), Q3 (–68.97 to –36.66), and Q4 (–36.65 to 53.92).