Table 1.
Method | Applications | Recent examples | Advantages | Limitations | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deep amplicon sequencing |
• rRNA |
• Prokaryotic and eukaryotic identification* |
• Characterization of the healthy human gut microbiome (HMP) [28] |
• Potentially higher sensitivity |
• Targeted gene may not be truly universal |
|
|
• Determination of taxonomic relationships |
• Ancient gut microbiomes found to be more similar to modern rural than modern cosmopolitan microbiomes [29] |
• Less expensive as fewer reads are required for taxonomic classification |
• Primer bias may alter population structure |
|
• rpoB |
• Archaeal and bacterial identification* |
• Used to divide the species Gardnerella vaginalis into subgroups [30] |
• rpoB and cpn-60 offer enhanced taxonomic resolution compared to rRNA [31,32] |
• Possibility of variable gene copy numbers amongst targeted species |
|
• cpn-60 |
• Determination of taxonomic relationships |
|
|
|
|
• Viral RNA polymerase (RdRP) |
• Novel virus discovery |
• Identified novel families of picornaviruses off the coast of British Columbia [33] |
|
|
Metagenomics |
• Shotgun sequencing |
• Functional and taxonomic characterization |
• Detection of African swine fever virus-like sequences representing new members of the family Asfariviridae [9] |
• Recovery of sequences from all microorganisms |
• Broad specificity might decrease sensitivity |
|
|
|
• Detection of unexpected microbes from stool samples [12] |
• No a priori knowledge of microorganisms required |
• Library preparation is relatively labor intensive |
|
• Subtraction |
• Functional and taxonomic characterization |
• Identified divergent regions in non-coding RNAs in Listeria monocytogenes[34] |
• Random primers reduce potential for bias |
• Bioinformatics analysis is more challenging |
|
|
|
• Association of Fusobacterium nucleatum with colorectal carcinoma [35] |
|
• Relatively expensive as more reads are required than for DAS |
|
• Virus concentration |
• Novel virus discovery |
• Detection of the novel H1N1 influenza from nasopharyngeal swabs [13] |
|
• Approximately 50% of sequences generally have no significant homology to known proteins in databases (dark matter) [36] |
|
|
|
• Detection of a novel rhabdovirus from serum [37] |
|
|
|
• Hybridization capture |
• Investigation of sequences with very low copy number |
• Metagenomic analysis of tuberculosis from a mummy [38] |
|
• Increased granularity in population structure determination [39] |
• Investigation of Yersinia pestis from ancient teeth [40] |
*Specific primers need to be made to discriminate between each group. RdRP, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.