Table 2.
Trial ID | Primary Efficacy Outcome | Explanation for Why Trial Interpretation was Altered | |
---|---|---|---|
ClinicalTrials.gov Reported Results | Publication Reported Results | ||
NCT00094887 | Median Hours to Resolution of Vaso-occlusive Pain Crisis (95% CI) | Time to resolution in both groups was substantially shorter on ClinicalTrials.gov than in publication. | |
Inhaled Nitric Oxide: 61.83, 95% CI: (41.75, 78.00); Placebo: 55.16, 95% CI: (46.00, 72.00); No statistical analysis provided. | Inhaled Nitric Oxide: 73.0, 95% CI: (46.0, 91.0); Placebo: 65.5, 95% CI: (48.1, 84.0); P = 0.87 | ||
NCT00108953 | Median Time to Progression (95% CI) | Median time to progression in both groups was substantially longer on ClinicalTrials.gov than in publication. | |
Sorafenib + Doxorubicin: 263 days, 95% CI: (146, 384); Placebo + Doxorubicin: 147 days, 95% CI: (66, 244); P = 0.016 | Sorafenib + Doxorubicin: 6.4 months, 95% CI: (4.8, 9.2); Placebo + Doxorubicin: 2.8 months, 95% CI: (1.6, 5); P = 0.02 | ||
NCT00177671 | Number of Participants With Recurrence of Major Depression | Percentage of participants with major depression recurrence was lower on ClinicalTrials.gov than in publication and hazard ratio on ClinicalTrials.gov is 2-fold greater. | |
Donepezil: 19/67, 95% CI: (16, 31); Placebo: 11/63, 95% CI: (6, 18); HR=3.97, SD=2.09, 95% CI: (1.00, 4.41); P=0.05 | Donepezil: 35%; 95% CI: (24%, 46%); Placebo: 19%, 95% CI: (9%, 29%); HR=2.09, 95% CI: (1.00, 4.41), λ2=3.97; P=0.05 | ||
NCT00281918 | Progression-Free Survival, median | Progression-Free Survival was substantially shorter in the rituximab substantially shorter in the rituximab arm reported on ClinicalTrials.gov than in publication. | |
Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide: 981.0 days, Range: (1, 1343); Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab: 1212.0 days, Range: (1, 1372); P<0.0001 | Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide: 32.8 months, 95% CI: (29.6, 36.0); Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide/ Rituximab: 51.8 months, 95% CI: (46.2, 57.6); P<0.0001 | ||
NCT00404079 | Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, 1 year | ClinicalTrials.gov score was higher for both trial arms than in publication and statistical testing results were different in two sources. | |
Glucosamine Sulphate: 9, SD: 4; Placebo: 9, SD: 4; Odds Ratio: 4.5 ± 4; P=0.05 | Glucosamine Sulphate: 4.8, 95% CI: (3.9, 5.6); Placebo: 5.5, 95% CI: (4.7, 6.4); P=0.50 | ||
NCT00426751 | Number of Participants With Complete Sum ST Resolution 60 Min After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Intent-to-Treat Population) | Confidence interval of the adjusted difference between arms crossed zero on ClinicalTrials.gov and did not in publication, suggesting a difference in statistical testing of results between the two sources. | |
Eptifibatide: 124/214; Abciximab: 103/196; Adjusted Difference: 6.8%, 95% CI: (−3.0%, 16.6%) | Eptifibatide: 62.6%; Abciximab: 56.3%; Adjusted Difference: 7.1%, 95% CI: (2.7%, 17.0%) |
Note: NCT is term used by ClinicalTrials.gov when assigning a unique clinical trial identifier; CI=Confidence Interval