Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr;53(100):34–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.12.012

Table 3.

Linear regression models for the association between cognitive abilities and combined longitudinal relaxation time (T1), MTR, FA and MD.

g
Speed
Memory
Right Left Right Left Right Left
STEP 1 Age −.04 (.416) −.04 (.421) −.07 (.141) −.08 (.109) −.03 (.714) −.02 (.671)
Gender −.02 (.65) −.02 (.642) −.014 (.747) .00 (.947) .05 (.299) .04 (.362)
T1 −.12 (.007) −.13 (.006) −.18 (<.001) −.16 (.001) −.10 (.028) −.11 (.019)
MTR .13 (.021) .12 (.027) .13 (.018) .12 (.027) .08 (.14) .07 (.18)
MD .01 (.853) −.02 (.664) −.05 (.337) −.03 (.612) −.05 (.42) −.07 (.167)
FA .13 (.009) .08 (.115) .09 (.079) .06 (.23) .07 (.19) .04 (.382)
Total r squared .07 .063 .102 .08 .048 .048
STEP 2 Age −.02 (.58) −.02 (.612) −.06 (.182) −.07 (.148) .01 (.977) .00 (.995)
Gender −.07 (.052) −.07 (.047) −.05 (.234) −.03 (.429) −.01 (.871) −.01 (.81)
T1 −.12 (.002) −.12 (.002) −.17 (<.001) −.15 (<.001) −.10 (.011) −.11 (.008)
MTR .07 (.117) .07 (.123) .09 (.069) .09 (.088) .03 (.553) .02 (.622)
MD −.02 (.621) −.05 (.268) −.07 (.153) −.04 (.384) −.08 (.086) −.09 (.041)*
FA .04 (.297) .01 (.759) .03 (.487) .02 (.707) −.02 (.647) −.02 (.701)
Age11IQ .56 (<.001) .57 (<.001) .36 (<.001) .37 (<.001) .54 (<.001) .54 (<.001)
Total r squared .371 .373 .228 .213 .325 .328
MMSE above 27, N = 483
g
Speed
Memory
Right Left Right Left Right Left
STEP 1 Age −.04 (.409) −.05 (.372) −.07 (.206) −.08 (.161) −.03 (.631) −.04 (.464)
Gender −.08 (.09) −.09 (.075) −.07 (.143) −.06 (.179) −.02 (.629) −.02 (.69)
T1 −.10 (.038)* −.10 (.055) −.15 (.003) −.13 (.008) −.07 (.139) −.05 (.383)
MTR .14 (.021) .12 (.043)* .15 (.01) .14 (.016) .08 (.198) .04 (.467)
MD .01 (.878) −.06 (.236) −.05 (.358) −.10 (.068) −.05 (.382) −.10 (.065)
FA .15 (.004) .12 (.022) .12 (.022) .09 (.08) .10 (.076) .10 (.058)
Total r squared .079 .079 .11 .105 .044 .048
STEP 2 Age −.03 (.504) −.03 (.519) −.06 (.254) −.06 (.223) −.01 (.81) −.02 (.671)
Gender −.10 (.022) −.10 (.011) −.08 (.074) −.08 (.083) −.04 (.381) −.04 (.394)
T1 −.11 (.011) −.12 (.006) −.15 (.001) −.15 (.002) −.09 (.053) −.07 (.117)
MTR .08 (.101) .08 (.128) .12 (.033)* .11 (.038)* .03 (.604) .00 (.949)
MD −.03 (.569) −.08 (.087) −.08 (.173) −.11 (.036)* −.09 (.078) −.12 (.017)*
FA .06 (.211) .04 (.382) .07 (.195) .04 (.388) .01 (.925) .03 (.58)
Age11IQ .51 (<.001) .52 (<.001) .31 (<.001) .32 (<.001) .48 (<.001) .48 (<.001)
Total r squared .331 .339 .205 .205 .260 .265

Note. Values are the standardized β (and p value) for the listed measures of hippocampus integrity predicting measures of cognitive abilities. Models used the entire sample.

* Represents associations that became non-significant at p < .05 after correction for multiple testing.

Model: cognition = β1*Ages + β2*Gender + β3*T1MAP + β4*MTR + β5*MD + β6*FA + β7*Age 11 IQ. Step 1 did not include age 11 IQ but step 2 included age 11 IQ. This stepwise modelling allowed us to compute the variance in cognition exclusively explained by age 11 IQ.