Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 3;9:1709–1716. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S56092

Table 2.

Results of the orthogonal experiment

(A) Inner water phase volume (mL) (B) VLPVPR (mg) (C) Outer water phase volume (mL) (D) Ultrasound of double emulsion DL (%) ER (%)
1# 0.1 5 1 5 s ×1 2.96 60.97
2# 0.1 7.5 2 5 s ×2 3.67 50.86
3# 0.1 10 3 5 s ×3 2.37 24.25
4# 0.2 5 3 5 s ×2 2.82 57.99
5# 0.2 7.5 1 5 s ×3 6.31 89.8
6# 0.2 10 2 5 s ×1 5.06 53.34
7# 0.4 5 2 5 s ×3 2.28 46.65
8# 0.4 7.5 3 5 s ×1 2.37 32.38
9# 0.4 10 1 5 s ×2 5.07 53.44
DL
 K1 9.00 8.06 10.39 14.34 Calibration parameter =120.38
 K2 14.19 12.36 11.57 11.02
 K3 9.72 12.50 10.96 7.56
 S 5.27 4.26 0.23 7.67
 F 23.02* 18.58 1.00 33.51*
ER
 K1 136.08 165.61 146.69 204.21 Calibration parameter =24,511.03
 K2 201.13 173.04 162.29 150.85
 K3 132.47 131.03 160.70 114.62
 S 995.41 335.09 49.13 1,354.03
 F 20.26* 6.82 1.00 27.56*

Notes:

*

Significant (P<0.05) by Student’s t-test.

Abbreviations: DL, drug loading; ER, encapsulated ratio; F, statistical analysis results for orthogonal experiment; K, the average DL and ER of nanoparticles under the various investigated conditions; S, standard deviation; s, seconds; VLPVPR, Val-Leu-Pro-Val-Pro-Arg.