Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Med Inform. 2014 Feb 3;83(5):376–384. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.011

Table 2.

Understanding of the Information by Message Delivery

Standard (SI) Interactive (IPI) Mean difference (95% CI)
Baseline understanding (Pre-test) 6.47 ± 2.5 6.57 ± 2.4 0.1 (−0.7, 0.9)
Post-test 1 (after intervention) 7.35 ± 2.5 8.28 ± 2.4* 0.93 (0.1, 1.7)
Low literacy 5.14 ± 2.7 6.40 ± 2.6 1.26 (−2.2, 4.8)
High literacy 7.83 ± 2.2 8.55 ± 2.3 0.7 (−0.6, 1.5)
Low numeracy 6.75 ± 2.5 7.63 ± 2.5 0.8 (−0.6, 2.4)
High numeracy 7.87 ± 2.3 8.72 ± 2.3 0.8 (−0.1, 1.8)
High school education 6.80 ± 2.8 6.76 ± 2.3 −0.04 (−1.7, 1.6)
> High school education 7.66 ± 2.3 8.77 ± 2.3*$ 1.1 (0.2, 1.9)
Post-test 2 (2 wks after intervention) 6.69 ± 2.5 7.60 ± 2.2* 0.91 (0.08, 1.7)
“Complete” Post-test 1understanding of:
Indications for cardiac catheterization 79.2 83.8
Procedure 33.8 47.3
Risks 57.1 70.3
Benefits 59.7 64.9
Alternatives to cardiac catheterization 9.1 25.7*

Data are presented as % and mean ± SD (based on a scale of 0–12, where 12 = Complete understanding). SI = Standard information, IPI interactive iPad information. CI = Confidence intervals

Low numeracy = 0–35, High numeracy = >35 on the Subjective Numeracy Scale

Low Literacy = 0–60 (3rd – 8th grade equivalence), High Literacy = >60 (9th grade equivalence or higher)

*

P< 0.05 vs Standard,

P< 0.05 vs Pre-test,

P<0.05 vs Low literacy,

$

P < 0.01 vs ≤ High school