. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 6.

Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2013 Dec 13;59(1):173–188. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/1/173

Table 2.

The difference (%) in the mean dose between the DDM and EMT cumulative plans and between the EMT and REF plans for the 2 cm volumes superior and inferior the PTV (see Fig. 4(d)).

Patient No.		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
2 cm superior PTV	(DDM-EMT)/EMT×100	−0.7	0.6	−0.3	0.0	−0.3	0.3	4.1	−0.5	−0.4	0.0
2 cm superior PTV	(EMT-REF)/EMT×100	12.2	15.7	9.9	15.6	9.8	4.3	17.8	3.7	24.5	20.3
2 cm inferior PTV	(DDM-EMT)/EMT×100	0.6	−1.7	1.8	−1.8	7.7	0	1.9	0.6	−2.6	−6.1
2 cm inferior PTV	(EMT-REF)/EMT×100	−29.5	−36.2	−22.9	−11.6	−48.7	−19.3	−47.2	−10.7	−47.1	−53.5