Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2013 May 23;154(9):1659–1667. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.05.008

Table 3.

The contribution of expected pain levels to pain in active and placebo acupuncture conditions

Overall Early Late
B R2 P B R2 P B R2 P
Actual group allocation
Active acupuncture
Expected pain intensity 0.569 0.257 0.003 0.525 0.162 0.022 0.999 0.698 <0.001
Expected pain unpleasantness 0.515 0.231 0.005 0.509 0.193 0.012 0.993 0.654 <0.001
Placebo acupuncture
Expected pain intensity 0.602 0.277 0.001 0.633 0.212 0.005 0.719 0.493 <0.001
Expected pain unpleasantness 0.744 0.384 <0.001 0.802 0.342 <0.001 0.893 0.690 <0.001
Perceived group allocation
Active acupuncture
Expected pain intensity 0.547 0.238 0.003 0.448 0.116 0.042 0.824 0.593 <0.001
Expected pain unpleasantness 0.456 0.167 0.013 0.402 0.111 0.047 0.963 0.571 <0.001
Placebo acupuncture
Expected pain intensity 0.578 0.311 0.001 0.664 0.276 0.003 0.731 0.488 <0.001
Expected pain unpleasantness 0.675 0.392 <0.001 0.762 0.371 <0.001 0.848 0.671 <0.001

B= unstandardized beta coefficient

R2= regression coefficient

P <0.05

Regression analyses showing the contribution of expected pain intensity and expected pain unpleasantness levels at a given time point to experienced pain intensity and unpleasantness levels at a subsequent time point. Overall: expected pain levels at −2 min seen in relation to the average pain ratings during the 30-min test period. Early: expected pain levels at −2 min in relation to pain levels at 13 min. Late: expected pain levels at 13 min in relation to pain levels at 28 min.