Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 21.
Published in final edited form as: FEBS Lett. 2013 Nov 5;588(2):219–229. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.10.040

Table 1.

Comparison of selection strategies for polymerase evolution

Strategy Advantages Disadvantages
Phage Display •Straightforward to select for modifications in primer, template and/or nucleotide triphsophate, including modifications in both strands simultaneously;
•Control of selection pressure;
•Challenging conditions easy to apply;
•Selection possible without amplification and even with the incorporation of a single nucleotide.
•Cross reactivity with sufficient enrichment, mandating the use of post-selection screen;
•Complicated.
CSR and derivatives •No cross reaction between mutants;
•Challenging conditions easy to apply.
•Requires amplification to select for modifications in both strands of DNA;
•Less control over selection pressure.
•Complicated.
Genetic complementation and derivatives •No cross reaction between mutants;
•Sufficient activity to replicate genome ensured
•Simple.
• Only natural substrates possible;
•Selection pressure difficult to control.
Autogene selection and derivatives •No cross reaction between mutants
•Simple.
•Only natural substrates possible;
•Selection pressure difficult to control.