Table 1.
Comparison of selection strategies for polymerase evolution
Strategy | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Phage Display | •Straightforward to select for modifications in primer, template and/or nucleotide triphsophate, including modifications in both strands simultaneously; •Control of selection pressure; •Challenging conditions easy to apply; •Selection possible without amplification and even with the incorporation of a single nucleotide. |
•Cross reactivity with sufficient enrichment, mandating the use of post-selection screen; •Complicated. |
CSR and derivatives | •No cross reaction between mutants; •Challenging conditions easy to apply. |
•Requires amplification to select for modifications in both strands of DNA; •Less control over selection pressure. •Complicated. |
Genetic complementation and derivatives | •No cross reaction between mutants; •Sufficient activity to replicate genome ensured •Simple. |
• Only natural substrates possible; •Selection pressure difficult to control. |
Autogene selection and derivatives | •No cross reaction between mutants •Simple. |
•Only natural substrates possible; •Selection pressure difficult to control. |