Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 18.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jun 18;139(3):639–647. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2598-7

Table 2.

Mammographic Features in 1187 Patients with Pure DCIS by ER Status

Feature ER-negative DCIS (N=215) ER-positive DCIS (N=972) P Value

Visible lesion 199 (93) 923 (95) 0.162

Size, cm, mean (SD)1 3.2 (2.8) 2.8(3.0) 0.141

Tissue density 0.054
 Fatty 3 (2) 40 (4)
 Scattered fibroglandular 68 (35) 267 (29)
 Heterogeneously dense 116 (59) 550 (59)
 Extremely dense 8 (4) 68 (7)

Mammographic finding 0.013
 Calcifications only 172 (86) 785 (85)
 Mass only 7 (4) 45 (5)
 Architectural distortion 0 13 (1)
 Focal asymmetry 3 (2) 17 (2)
 Mass with calcifications 9 (5) 34 (4)
 Architectural distortion with calcifications 7 (4) 6 (1)
 Focal asymmetry with calcifications 1 (1) 21 (2)

Mass shape2 0.323
 Round 0 14 (19)
 Oval 3 (38) 23 (31)
 Lobular 0 11 (15)
 Irregular 5 (63) 26 (35)

Mass margin2 0.624
 Circumscribed 2 (25) 17 (23)
 Microlobulated 0 4 (5)
 Obscured 1 (13) 26 (35)
 Indistinct 3 (38) 20 (27)
 Spiculated 2 (25) 11 (15)

Mass density3 0.045
 Isodense 8 (100) 42 (62)
 High density 0 26 (38)

Calcifications shape4 0.122
 Round 1 (1) 17 (2)
 Amorphous 42 (22) 166 (21)
 Coarse heterogeneous 39 (21) 116 (15)
 Fine pleomorphic 81 (42) 393 (50)
 Fine linear/linear branching 25 (13) 94 (12)

Calcifications distribution5 0.287
 Diffuse 2(1) 8 (1)
 Regional 33 (18) 109 (14)
 Segmental 41 (22) 178 (22)
 Linear 5 (3) 47 (6)
 Cluster/group 105 (56) 459 (57)

Note.—Unless otherwise indicated, data are numbers of patients (percentages).

1

Not recorded in 190 patients.

2

Not recorded in 13 patients.

3

Not recorded in 19 patients.

4

Not recorded in 61 patients.

5

Not recorded in 48 patients.