Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 10.
Published in final edited form as: Platelets. 2010;21(3):167–175. doi: 10.3109/09537101003611385

Table II.

Protein expression in platelets from different species.

Proteins Species OCS+
OCS
p-value#
Human Murine Canine Bovine Camelid Equine
Arf6 1.74 (±0.45) 1.19 0.84 0.37 1.03 0.52 0.1336
β-Actinin 0.43 (±0.02) 0.27 0.16 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.0627
FAK 0.64 (±0.07) 0.37 0.54 0.43 0.31 0.29 0.1258
Arf1/3 0.81 (±0.25) 0.50 0.47 0.39 0.38 0.46 0.1734
Cdc42 0.58 (±0.30) 0.30 0.23 0.14 0.16 0.08 0.0881
Rac1 1.79 (±0.28) 2.44 2.29 1.07 1.14 1.01 0.0055
RhoA 0.56 (±0.28) 0.38 0.62 0.25 0.31 0.31 0.0368
Rap1 2.28 (±0.30) 1.67 1.83 1.41 1.50 1.39 0.0586
RalA 1.12 (±0.25) 0.72 1.62 0.67 0.95 0.96 0.3487
Ras-K, H, or N 0.31 (±0.15) 0.27 0.26 0.18 0.20 0.21 0.0093
CaM 0.40 (±0.11) 0.26 0.40 0.20 0.21 0.20 0.0332
Src(pp60) 0.93 (±0.05) 0.69 0.76 0.21 0.51 0.49 0.0315
β3 integrin 0.77 (±0.03) 0.59 0.37 0.59 0.49 0.53 0.7691
IQGAP1 0.09 (±0.03) 0.35 0.71 0.84 0.85 0.60 0.1276
IQGAP2 0.62 (±0.08) 0.04 0.49 0.03 0.28 0.29 0.3932
GIT1 0.08 (±0.03) 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.1328
ASAP1 0.19 (±0.09) 0.07 0.18 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.0554

The ratios of different proteins to RabGDIα were calculated from the fluorescent intensities of the immuno-decorated proteins detected in Figure 2. The human values were averaged from the five samples. The standard deviations from the five human samples (Figure 2) were calculated and shown in parenthesis.

#

To evaluate correlations, the ratios were grouped as OCS+ and OCS species, averaged, and the significance of the differences between averages were tested by unpaired Student’s t-test. p values<0.05 were considered to be significant (bold).