Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sex Res. 2013 Oct 10;51(8):882–892. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.818615

Table 3.

Multivariate Negative Binomial regression examining the relationship between URAI partners and URAI occasions and revised HBI subscales, respectively.

URAI Partners URAI Occasions

AOR 95% CI Wald χ2 AOR 95% CI Wald χ2
Age 1.02 (.93, 1.12) .21 .94 (.87, 1.01) 2.67
Control 1.06* (1.00, 1.12) 3.72 1.07** (1.02, 1.13) 6.55
Coping .98 (.91, 1.04) .59 .93** (.88, .99) 5.19
Consequences 1.05 (.91, 1.21) .43 .98 (.86, 1.12) .09
Decisional Balance 1.56*** (1.30, 1.87) 22.33 2.52*** (2.09, 3.05) 91.14
Pleasure Interference 1.15*** (1.07, 1.23) 16.35 1.07* (1.01, 1.14) 4.56
Serodiscordant Partner 2.02* (1.09, 3.77) 4.92 1.22 (.67, 2.22) .41
Hispanic a 1.76* (1.09, 2.86) 5.33 .98 (.62, 1.55) .01
B .66 (.29, 1.53) .92 ..63 (.30, 1.34) 1.45
Asian Pacific Islander .65 (.32, 1.30) 1.51 .61 (.33, 1.14) 2.41
Native American or Other Race 1.55 (.67, 3.62) 1.04 1.39 (.63, 3.07) .66
*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001.

a

Whites serve as the comparison group.