Table 1. Comparison between the (αh, βh, γh) Sampled by TOPRNA Bulge Simulations, the (αh, βh, γh) Conformations Observed in the PDB, and Conformations Predicted by the Rigid-Body Model29.
bulge | fraction of total (αh, βh, γh) sampled by TOPRNA (rigid-body)a | fraction of TOPRNA (αh, βh, γh) overlap with rigid-bodyb | fraction of rigid-body (αh, βh, γh) overlap with TOPRNAc | fraction of PDB conformations sampled by TOPRNA (rigid-body)d |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-nt | 0.075 (0.053) | 0.61 | 1.0 | 1.0 (1.0) |
2-nt | 0.11 (0.097) | 0.72 | 0.95 | 0.99 (0.79) |
3-nt | 0.15 (0.20) | 0.81 | 0.80 | 1.0 (0.99) |
4-nt | 0.20 (0.38) | 0.81 | 0.53 | 1.0 (0.93) |
Due to rounding (αh, βh, γh) to a 10° vs 5° grid, the rigid-body fractions differ slightly from that reported in ref (29).
The fraction of TOPRNA sampled conformations that are found within the ref (29) idealized-helix topologically allowed space.
The fraction of ref (29) idealized-helix topologically allowed conformations sampled by TOPRNA, excluding ref (29) conformations that were added to the rigid-body-rotation-derived allowable conformations as estimates of error padding or “intrinsic helical degrees of freedom”.
Comparisons were done to a total of 1853, 705, 347, and 30 PDB structures of 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-nt bulge systems, respectively.