Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 18;118(10):2615–2627. doi: 10.1021/jp411478x

Table 1. Comparison between the (αh, βh, γh) Sampled by TOPRNA Bulge Simulations, the (αh, βh, γh) Conformations Observed in the PDB, and Conformations Predicted by the Rigid-Body Model29.

bulge fraction of total (αh, βh, γh) sampled by TOPRNA (rigid-body)a fraction of TOPRNA (αh, βh, γh) overlap with rigid-bodyb fraction of rigid-body (αh, βh, γh) overlap with TOPRNAc fraction of PDB conformations sampled by TOPRNA (rigid-body)d
1-nt 0.075 (0.053) 0.61 1.0 1.0 (1.0)
2-nt 0.11 (0.097) 0.72 0.95 0.99 (0.79)
3-nt 0.15 (0.20) 0.81 0.80 1.0 (0.99)
4-nt 0.20 (0.38) 0.81 0.53 1.0 (0.93)
a

Due to rounding (αh, βh, γh) to a 10° vs 5° grid, the rigid-body fractions differ slightly from that reported in ref (29).

b

The fraction of TOPRNA sampled conformations that are found within the ref (29) idealized-helix topologically allowed space.

c

The fraction of ref (29) idealized-helix topologically allowed conformations sampled by TOPRNA, excluding ref (29) conformations that were added to the rigid-body-rotation-derived allowable conformations as estimates of error padding or “intrinsic helical degrees of freedom”.

d

Comparisons were done to a total of 1853, 705, 347, and 30 PDB structures of 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-nt bulge systems, respectively.