Table 5.
Sensitivityb | Specificity | Sample Size | Validation Percentc | Naive |
Validation |
Direct Maximum Likelihood |
Multiple Imputation |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Biasd | Covere | MSEf | Bias | Cover | MSE | Bias | Cover | MSE | Bias | Cover | MSE | ||||
(0.95, 0.85) | 0.9 | 1,000 | 10 | 34 | 36 | 14 | −5 | 96 | 47 | −5 | 96 | 41 | 4 | 100 | 12 |
1,000 | 30 | 34 | 36 | 14 | −1 | 95 | 10 | −1 | 95 | 6 | 1 | 97 | 6 | ||
300 | 30 | 34 | 75 | 19 | −5 | 96 | 47 | −4 | 96 | 42 | 3 | 99 | 17 | ||
(0.70, 0.50) | 0.9 | 1,000 | 10 | 60 | 4 | 39 | −5 | 96 | 47 | −5 | 96 | 46 | 3 | 98 | 17 |
1,000 | 30 | 60 | 4 | 39 | −1 | 95 | 10 | −1 | 95 | 8 | 0 | 96 | 7 | ||
300 | 30 | 60 | 47 | 45 | −5 | 96 | 47 | −5 | 96 | 49 | 2 | 98 | 23 |
Abbreviation: MSE, mean squared error.
a Results are summarized over 10,000 simulations.
b Sensitivity differs by exposure group; presented as (sensitivity for X = 1, sensitivity for X = 0).
c Percent of all participants included in the validation subgroup.
d Bias was defined as 100 times the difference between the average estimated log odds ratio and the true log odds ratio.
e Confidence interval coverage was calculated as the percentage of simulations in which the estimated 95% Wald-type confidence limits included the true value.
f MSE was calculated as the sum of the bias squared and the variance.