Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 4;8:38. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2014.00038

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The different studied architectures and three-factor STDP. (A) Illustration of our main model (Equations 31, 32) with its two sets of synapses graphic file with name fncom-08-00038-i0004.jpg (black) and graphic file with name fncom-08-00038-i0001.jpg (gray). The “error signal” eN(t) modulates the learning of the graphic file with name fncom-08-00038-i0004.jpg-synapses. (B) Illustration of the simplified model (Equations 33, 34) with its single set of synapses graphic file with name fncom-08-00038-i0001.jpg. The “error signal” eN(t) modulates the learning of the graphic file with name fncom-08-00038-i0001.jpg-synapses. (C) Learning in the main model's graphic file with name fncom-08-00038-i0004.jpg-synapses is triggered by the covariance between the Hebbian trace HInline graphicij and the moving average of free energy graphic file with name fncom-08-00038-i0010.jpg. The inset blue curve indicates the shape of the Hebbian trace term as a function of the time interval between pre and post synaptic spikes. The dotted gray line corresponds to HInline graphicij = 0 (no weight change). A positive covariance will induce synaptic depression (left quadrant of blue curve) while a negative covariance will induce synaptic potentiation (right quadrant of blue curve). A null covariance would induce a centered random walk on the synaptic weights.