Table 1.

Profile scanning for the centromere-specific cleavage pattern^*

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01861.008

		15 centromere Profile			Delete-one jackknife†
Chr	# aligned	# pass filters	First Cen	First FP	# pass filters	First Cen	First FP
1	230,107	6	0.778‡	0.317	5	0.745	0.303
2	813,073	34	0.849	0.401	23	–	0.420
3	316,509	8	0.822‡	0.388	7	0.571	0.426
4§	1,531,822	–	–	–	31	–	0.394
5	576,763	51	0.807	0.611¶	48	–	0.625¶
6	270,050	14	0.726‡	0.389	13	0.723	0.306
7	1,090,829	33	0.756‡	0.450	32	0.707	0.466
8	562,532	7	0.459‡	0.346	4	–	0.293
9	439,777	11	0.493	0.375	2	–	−0.092
10	745,640	22	0.626‡	0.402	19	0.579	0.357
11	666,705	23	0.634‡	0.407	15	–	0.326
12	1,078,066	48	0.742‡	0.430	47	0.698	0.453
13	924,320	48	0.873‡	0.491	53	0.847	0.498
14	784,222	23	0.778‡	0.398	16	0.748	0.384
15	1,091,180	21	0.796	0.457	11	–	0.420
16	947,955	32	0.764‡	0.455	23	0.464	0.478
Median**	764,931	22.5	0.760	0.402	17.5	0.518	0.407

^*Alignments to the profile with more than three positions greater than three standard deviations from the mean of the profile position or with a maximum position less than the smallest maximum position within the profile (186) were excluded (filters). Pearson correlation coefficients are shown.

^†Only jackknife results for the centromere deleted from the model are shown.

^‡Multiple high-scoring centromere hits above the first false positive (FP) one or two base pairs apart.

^§Cen4 (111 bp) was not included in the model.

^¶Single base-pair cleavage peak at a site of anomalously low nucleosome occupancy.

^**Medians are based on all alignments for all 16 chromosomes, whether or not they passed the filters.