Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 5;69(3):470–481. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu014

Table 3.

Results of the Unconstrained Multiple-Group Structural Equation Model for Women

Czech Republic (n = 2,991) Russia (n = 4,488) Poland (n = 5,281) Lithuania (n = 3,708)
Est SE p Value Std Est SE p Value Std Est SE p Value Std Est SE p Value Std
Direct effects on cognition
 Mother’s education 0.42 0.10 <.001 0.11 0.20 0.07 .002 0.06 0.30 0.08 <.001 0.07 0.02 0.07 .743 0.01
 Childhood amenities −0.07 0.05 .113 −0.04 0.12 0.03 <.001 0.07 0.05 0.03 .130 0.03 −0.06 0.04 .117 −0.03
 Education 1.05 0.06 <.001 0.52 0.81 0.06 <.001 0.32 1.05 0.06 <.001 0.40 1.19 0.05 <.001 0.54
 Household assets 0.04 0.03 .132 0.04 0.26 0.03 <.001 0.19 0.10 0.03 <.001 0.07 0.10 0.02 <.001 0.08
Direct effects on household assets
 Mother’s education 0.21 0.07 .001 0.06 0.21 0.04 <.001 0.08 0.12 0.05 .015 0.04 0.19 0.05 <.001 0.07
 Childhood amenities 0.09 0.03 .004 0.06 0.08 0.02 <.001 0.07 0.10 0.02 <.001 0.09 0.14 0.03 <.001 0.09
 Education 0.41 0.04 <.001 0.23 0.38 0.04 <.001 0.20 0.52 0.04 <.001 0.29 0.40 0.04 <.001 0.22
Direct effects on education
 Mother’s education 0.51 0.04 <.001 0.27 0.45 0.03 <.001 0.35 0.57 0.03 <.001 0.35 0.51 0.03 <.001 0.34
 Childhood amenities 0.15 0.02 <.001 0.19 0.07 0.02 <.001 0.10 0.15 0.01 <.001 0.24 0.09 0.02 <.001 0.10
Indirect effects on cognition
 Mother’s education → education 0.55 0.05 <.001 0.14 0.36 0.03 <.001 0.11 0.61 0.04 <.001 0.14 0.62 0.04 <.001 0.19
 Mother’s education → assets 0.01 0.01 .179 0.00 0.06 0.01 <.001 0.02 0.01 0.01 .036 0.00 0.02 0.01 .008 0.01
 Mother’s education → education → assets 0.01 0.01 .118 0.00 0.05 0.01 <.001 0.01 0.03 0.01 <.001 0.01 0.02 0.01 <.001 0.01
 Total indirect 0.57 0.05 <.001 0.15 0.47 0.03 <.001 0.14 0.65 0.04 <.001 0.15 0.66 0.04 <.001 0.20
 Amenities → education 0.16 0.02 <.001 0.10 0.05 0.01 <.001 0.03 0.01 0.00 .001 0.01 0.11 0.02 <.001 0.05
 Amenities → assets 0.00 0.00 .168 0.00 0.02 0.01 <.001 0.01 0.01 0.00 <.001 0.01 0.01 0.00 .002 0.01
 Amenities → education → assets 0.00 0.00 .121 0.00 0.01 0.00 <.001 0.00 0.05 0.03 .130 0.03 0.00 0.00 .002 0.00
 Total indirect 0.17 0.02 <.001 0.10 0.07 0.01 <.001 0.04 0.18 0.01 <.001 0.11 0.13 0.02 <.001 0.06
 Education → assets 0.02 0.01 .115 0.01 0.10 0.01 <.001 0.04 0.06 0.01 <.001 0.02 0.04 0.01 <.001 0.02
Total effects on cognition
 Mother’s education 1.00 0.09 <.001 0.26 0.65 0.06 <.001 0.19 0.95 0.08 <.001 0.22 0.70 0.07 <.001 0.21
 Childhood amenities 0.12 0.04 .008 0.07 0.22 0.03 <.001 0.13 0.23 0.03 <.001 0.14 0.06 0.04 .160 0.03
 Education 1.06 0.06 <.001 0.52 0.92 0.06 <.001 0.35 1.11 0.06 <.001 0.42 1.26 0.05 <.001 0.56

Note. Fit indices: χ 2 (94) = 621.824; comparative fit index = 0.979; Tucker–Lewis index = 0.955; root mean square error of approximation = 0.038 (0.035–0.041). Paths from mother’s education and childhood amenities to education are probit coefficients. Est = unstandardized path coefficient; Std = standardized path coefficient.