Table 3.
Czech Republic (n = 2,991) | Russia (n = 4,488) | Poland (n = 5,281) | Lithuania (n = 3,708) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Est | SE | p Value | Std | Est | SE | p Value | Std | Est | SE | p Value | Std | Est | SE | p Value | Std | |
Direct effects on cognition | ||||||||||||||||
Mother’s education | 0.42 | 0.10 | <.001 | 0.11 | 0.20 | 0.07 | .002 | 0.06 | 0.30 | 0.08 | <.001 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.07 | .743 | 0.01 |
Childhood amenities | −0.07 | 0.05 | .113 | −0.04 | 0.12 | 0.03 | <.001 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.03 | .130 | 0.03 | −0.06 | 0.04 | .117 | −0.03 |
Education | 1.05 | 0.06 | <.001 | 0.52 | 0.81 | 0.06 | <.001 | 0.32 | 1.05 | 0.06 | <.001 | 0.40 | 1.19 | 0.05 | <.001 | 0.54 |
Household assets | 0.04 | 0.03 | .132 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.03 | <.001 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.03 | <.001 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.02 | <.001 | 0.08 |
Direct effects on household assets | ||||||||||||||||
Mother’s education | 0.21 | 0.07 | .001 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.04 | <.001 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.05 | .015 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.05 | <.001 | 0.07 |
Childhood amenities | 0.09 | 0.03 | .004 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.02 | <.001 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.02 | <.001 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.03 | <.001 | 0.09 |
Education | 0.41 | 0.04 | <.001 | 0.23 | 0.38 | 0.04 | <.001 | 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.04 | <.001 | 0.29 | 0.40 | 0.04 | <.001 | 0.22 |
Direct effects on education | ||||||||||||||||
Mother’s education | 0.51 | 0.04 | <.001 | 0.27 | 0.45 | 0.03 | <.001 | 0.35 | 0.57 | 0.03 | <.001 | 0.35 | 0.51 | 0.03 | <.001 | 0.34 |
Childhood amenities | 0.15 | 0.02 | <.001 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.02 | <.001 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.01 | <.001 | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.02 | <.001 | 0.10 |
Indirect effects on cognition | ||||||||||||||||
Mother’s education → education | 0.55 | 0.05 | <.001 | 0.14 | 0.36 | 0.03 | <.001 | 0.11 | 0.61 | 0.04 | <.001 | 0.14 | 0.62 | 0.04 | <.001 | 0.19 |
Mother’s education → assets | 0.01 | 0.01 | .179 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.01 | <.001 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | .036 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 | .008 | 0.01 |
Mother’s education → education → assets | 0.01 | 0.01 | .118 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.01 | <.001 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | <.001 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <.001 | 0.01 |
Total indirect | 0.57 | 0.05 | <.001 | 0.15 | 0.47 | 0.03 | <.001 | 0.14 | 0.65 | 0.04 | <.001 | 0.15 | 0.66 | 0.04 | <.001 | 0.20 |
Amenities → education | 0.16 | 0.02 | <.001 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 | <.001 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.00 | .001 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.02 | <.001 | 0.05 |
Amenities → assets | 0.00 | 0.00 | .168 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <.001 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | <.001 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | .002 | 0.01 |
Amenities → education → assets | 0.00 | 0.00 | .121 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | <.001 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.03 | .130 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | .002 | 0.00 |
Total indirect | 0.17 | 0.02 | <.001 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.01 | <.001 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.01 | <.001 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.02 | <.001 | 0.06 |
Education → assets | 0.02 | 0.01 | .115 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.01 | <.001 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.01 | <.001 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.01 | <.001 | 0.02 |
Total effects on cognition | ||||||||||||||||
Mother’s education | 1.00 | 0.09 | <.001 | 0.26 | 0.65 | 0.06 | <.001 | 0.19 | 0.95 | 0.08 | <.001 | 0.22 | 0.70 | 0.07 | <.001 | 0.21 |
Childhood amenities | 0.12 | 0.04 | .008 | 0.07 | 0.22 | 0.03 | <.001 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.03 | <.001 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.04 | .160 | 0.03 |
Education | 1.06 | 0.06 | <.001 | 0.52 | 0.92 | 0.06 | <.001 | 0.35 | 1.11 | 0.06 | <.001 | 0.42 | 1.26 | 0.05 | <.001 | 0.56 |
Note. Fit indices: χ 2 (94) = 621.824; comparative fit index = 0.979; Tucker–Lewis index = 0.955; root mean square error of approximation = 0.038 (0.035–0.041). Paths from mother’s education and childhood amenities to education are probit coefficients. Est = unstandardized path coefficient; Std = standardized path coefficient.