Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 11.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2013 Nov 8;165(1):9–18. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32212

TABLE III.

Summary Statistics for ERP Phenotypes

Phenotype SCZ BPD Controls SCZ vs. Controls BPD vs. Controls SCZ vs. BPD
P50 ratio (%) 73.58 (42.3) 71.3 0(48.5) 45.29 (27.4) P <0.0001 P <0.0001 P =0.80
P3 amplitude 8.59 (4.4) 8.97 (5.1) 12.65 (5.35) P <0.0001 P <0.0001 P =0.90
P3 latency 414.04 (86.8) 398.28 (68.2) 374.59 (49.5) P =0.006 P =0.06 P =0.16
N1 amplitude −3.46 (2.5) −4.15 (2.7) −4.92 (3.2) P =0.003 P =0.09 P =0.13
P2 amplitude 4.94 (3.2) 4.98 (3.0) 7.02 (4.2) P =0.004 P <0.0001 P =0.68

Note: age, sex, EEG equipment system were included as covariates. Significant level was set at P <0.017, correction for 3 post-hoc comparisons. mean (SD).