Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2012 Nov 15;189(5):1791–1796. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.066

Table 2.

Study cohort demographics and provider information by UDS complexity

All UDS CMG CMG + PFS VUDS p Value
Mean age ± SD 53.0 ± 13.1 53.5 ± 13.7 52.8 ± 12.9 53.5 ± 13.8 0.6
No. women (%) 13,803 (83.3) 3,101 (81.2) 9,949 (84.9) 753 (72.8) <0.001
No. men (%) 2,770 (16.7) 717 (18.8) 1,771 (15.1) 282 (27.3)
No. race (%):
 White 11,278 (68.1) 2,666 (69.8) 7,900 (67.4) 712 (68.8) 0.018
 Nonwhite 5,296 (32.0) 1,152 (30.2) 3,821 (32.6) 323 (31.2)
No. region (%):
 Midwest 4,988 (30.1) 1,459 (38.2) 3,394 (29.0) 135 (13.0) <0.001
 Northeast 1,996 (12.0) 494 (12.9) 1,349 (11.5) 153 (14.8)
 South 7,782 (47.0) 1,433 (37.5) 5,673 (48.4) 676 (65.3)
 West 1,807 (10.9) 432 (11.3) 1,304 (11.1) 71 (6.9)
No. UDS by specialty (%):
 Urology 9,908 (59.8) 1,668 (52.9) 5,900 (58.6) 763 (87.7) <0.001
 Gynecology 5,853 (35.3) 1,291 (40.9) 3,771 (37.4) 37 (4.3)
 Other 813 (4.9) 195 (6.2) 404 (4.0) 70 (8.1)
No. UDS/provider (%):
 Less than 14 3,565 (25.3) 1,056 (33.5) 2,408 (23.9) 101 (11.6) <0.001
 14–90 6,979 (49.5) 1,492 (47.3) 5,065 (50.3) 422 (48.5)
 Greater than 90 3,555 (25.2) 606 (19.2) 2,602 (25.8) 347 (39.9)