Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 10;7:10.3402/gha.v7.22942. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.22942

Table 3.

Association (adjusted odds ratio, 95% CI) between condom efficacy and inconsistent condom use among Ugandan University students

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6
Low condom efficacy 4.34 (2.51–7.52) 4.03 (3.29–7.08) 4.02 (2.28–7.08) 3.87 (2.19–6.86) 4.00 (2.24–7.11) 3.94 (2.20–7.05)
Female 1.27 (0.79–2.04) 1.29 (0.79–2.10) 1.29 (0.79–2.10) 1.32 (0.80–2.15) 1.25 (0.76–2.07) 1.33 (0.80–2.21)
≤23 years 1.66 (1.01–2.73) 1.66 (1.01–2.73) 1.76 (1.07–2.91) 1.75 (1.06–2.90) 1.79 (1.08–2.97)
Rural 2.10 (1.31–3.36) 2.09 (1.30–3.35) 2.15 (1.33–3.45) 2.12 (1.31–3.42) 2.18 (1.34–3.54)
Friends use condom with new partner 1.03 (0.63–1.67) 0.99 (0.60–1.61) 0.98 (0.60–1.61) 0.94 (0.57–1.55)
Friends have difficulty demanding condom use with new partner 1.05 (0.66–1.69) 1.06 (0.66–1.70) 1.08 (0.67–1.75) 1.09 (0.67–1.76)
Less pleasure with using a condom 1.74 (1.04–2.92) 1.75 (1.04–2.93) 1.78 (1.06–3.00)
Multiple sexual partners 0.79 (0.49–1.28) 0.69 (0.41–1.13)
Alcohol in relation to sex 2.13 (1.19–3.82)