Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Jan 9;60(5):1446–1452. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2237030

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The effect of altering the baseline 4.4 mm subcutaneous fat thickness on the resistance, reactance and phase. Thicknesses were input in a range from 2.2 mm to 17.6 mm using the electrode arrangement and spacing shown in Fig. 1. Note how the resistance and phase values show a very strong dependence on subcutaneous fat, whereas the reactance in the 10–150 kHz shows a more modest sensitivity.