Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 18;40(3):642–652. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt047

Table 3.

Primary Outcomes (SPEM, PPI, Auditory ERP) in the Schizophrenia and Psychotic Bipolar I Disorder Probands, and Healthy Controls

SZP vs BDP SZP vs HC BDP vs HC
Measure χ 2 P-Value λ D χ2 P-Value λ d χ 2 P-Value λ d
SPEM (gain)
MPG_9.9 0.00 .98 0.05 0.09 5.91 .02 −6.93 −0.56 5.49 .02 −6.00 −0.57
MPG_18.7 0.61 .43 1.24 0.22 3.83 .05 −3.95 −0.33 6.09 .01 −4.70 −0.52
MPG_25.0 0.04 .84 0.28 0.13 6.49 .01 −4.22 −0.53 7.25 .01 −4.59 −0.67
PPG_9.9 0.04 .84 0.40 0.09 9.41 .00 −7.34 −0.70 9.02 .00 −7.08 −0.73
PPG_18.7 0.00 .99 0.02 0.00 12.44 .00 −7.27 −0.83 12.83 .00 −9.49 −0.91
PPG_25.0 0.07 .79 0.44 0.14 9.61 .00 −6.36 −0.69 9.12 .00 −5.47 −0.73
PPI and PPF (Δ%)a
PPI 0.00 .97 0.00 −0.10 0.43 .51 −0.01 −0.22 0.21 .65 −0.01 −0.12
PPF 1.30 .25 −0.01 −0.13 0.00 .98 0.00 −0.03 0.06 .80 0.00 0.08
Auditory ERP (dB)
Beta 0.00 .96 0.00 0.07 5.81 .02 −0.17 −0.90 5.37 .02 −0.19 −0.90
Theta/alpha 0.19 .66 −0.02 −0.10 7.21 .01 −0.17 −0.93 5.24 .02 −0.15 −0.84

aGender comparisons (ordinary regression): (1) SZP: PPI, t = 0.37, P = .71, λ = 4.85; PPF, t = 1.19, P = .24, λ = 14.80; (2) BDP: PPI, t = −0.89, P = .38, λ = −11.16; PPF, t = 0.62, P = .54, λ = 9.46; (3) HC: PPI, t = −0.05, P = .96, λ = −0.44; PPF, t = −2.51, P = .02, λ =−48.75.