Skip to main content
. 2013 May 13;40(3):626–641. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt063
Study Author Year Designs Go/No-Go Taska Handedness Performing Hand Contrast Included in ALE Rate of Go/No-Go
7 K. Rubia 2001 Block Simple task Right Right Go/no-go block—go block 70%/30%
8 K. R. Laurens 2003 Event Simple task Right Right Correct no-go trail—correct go trail 84%/16%
9 R. Elliott 2004 Block Emotional task Right Right Mix-stimuli Go/no-go block—rest block 50%/50%
10 L. L. Altshuler 2005 Block Simple task Right Right Go/no-go block—go block 50%/50%
11 E. Arce 2006 Block Simple task 82% Right NA Go/no-go block—go block 68%/31%
12 D. Silbersweig 2007 Block Emotional task 90% Right Right Netural go/no-go block—go block 63%/37%
13 C. C. Joyal 2007 Block Simple task Right NA Go/no-go block—go block NA
14 A. Kaladjian 2007 Event Simple task Right NA Correct no-go trail—correct go trail 50%/50%
15 R. M. Roth 2007 Event Simple task Right Right No-go trail—go trail Gradient
16 A. Kaladjian 2009 Event Simple task Right NA Correct no-go trail—correct go trail 50%/50%
17 A. Kaladjian 2009 Event Simple task Right NA Correct no-go trail—correct go trail 50%/50%
18 A. S. Welander-Vatn 2009 Block Simple task Right NA Go/no-go block—rest block 75%/25%
19 P. Mazzola-Pomietto 2009 Event Simple task Right Right Correct no-go trail—correct go trail 50%/505
20 D. E. Fleck 2011 Event Simple task Right Right No-go trail—go trail 83%/17%
21 J. D. Townsend 2012 Block Simple task Right NA Go/no-go block—go block 50%/50%

Note: ALE, activation likelihood estimation; NA, not applicable.

aAll of the go/no-go task instructed the participants to respond to the go signal as soon as possible and suppress response to no-go signal.