Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Med. 2013 Jul;19(7):837–849. doi: 10.1038/nm.3248

Table 1. Characteristics of inhibitor classes.

Inhibitor class Resistance Potency Lead compoundsa Developmental stage
DAAs
NS3-NS4A protease inhibitors
 First generation Low-medium barrier High toward genotype 1, lower toward genotypes 2 and 3 Telaprevir (Incivek, Incivo) Approved
Boceprevir (Victrelis) Approved
Simeprevir (TMC-435) Phase 3/NDA
Faldaprevir (BI201335) Phase 3
Vaniprevir (MK-7009) Phase 3
Asunaprevir (BMS-650032) Phase 3
ABT-450 Phase 3
Danoprevir (RG7227) Phase 2
Sovaprevir (ACH-1625) Phase 2
Vedroprevir (GS-9451) Phase 2
 Second generation Medium barrier High; expected to be pan-genotypic MK-5172 Phase 2
Neceprevir (ACH-2684) Phase 2

NS5A inhibitorsb Low-medium barrier Very high Daclatasvir (BMS-790052) Phase 3
Ledipasvir (GS-5885) Phase 3
ABT-267 Phase 3
GSK2336805 Phase 2
ACH-3102 Phase 2
IDX-719 Phase 2
MK-8742 Phase 2
PPI-668 Phase 2
GS-5816 Phase 2

NS5B polymerase inhibitors
 Nucleoside/nucleotide analogs Medium-high barrier High; pan-genotypic Sofosbuvir (GS-7977) Phase 3/NDA
Mericitabine (RG7128) Phase 2
VX-135 Phase 2
 Non-nucleoside analogsc Low barrier, escape mutants have high fitness Medium-high; highly genotype or subtype specific ABT-333 (Palm-I/C) Phase 3
BI207127 (Thumb-I/A) Phase 3
BMS-791325 (Thumb-I/A) Phase 2
Lomibuvir (VX-222) (Thumb-II/B) Phase 2
ABT-072 (Palm-I/C) Phase 2
Setrobuvir (RG7790) (Palm-I/C) Phase 2
GS-9669 (Thumb-II/B) Phase 2
TMC647055 (Thumb-I/A) Phase 2

HTAs
Cyclophilin inhibitors Resistance reported in vitro only Medium, pan-genotypic Alisporivir (DEBIO-025) Phase 3 (on holdd)
SCY-635 Phase 2
miR-122 antagonists No resistance, though recombinant resistance mutants were reported in vitro High, pan-genotypic Miravirsen (SPC3649) Phase 2
Entry inhibitors No resistance, though recombinant resistance mutants were reported in vitro Unknown TX-5061 Phase 2

NDA, new drug application currently under evaluation.

a

This table was assembled from inhibitor classes currently in clinical studies, with the aim of including the most promising compounds (in phases 2 and 3) of each class. Any bias in selection is unintended. Updates to the HCV antiviral pipeline can be found online at websites such as http://www.pipelinereport.org/, http://www.natap.org/or http://hcvadvocate.blogspot.ca/.

b

Some genotype limitations for first-generation inhibitors. It is anticipated that second-generation inhibitors will address these concerns

c

Owing to the low resistance barrier, these will only be useful in combination with other DAAs. The allosteric NS5B target site is noted for the individual inhibitors.

d

Currently on clinical hold because of cases of pancreatitis when combined with peg-IFN-α and ribavirin. Could hold promise for IFN-free regimens.