Table 4.
Efficacy and safety of insulin lispro in pregnancy
Author | Type of study | n | Type of diabetes | Type of insulin | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Colatrella et al. [26] | Retrospective | 89 | T1DM and GDM | Lispro protamine versus NPH | Pregnancy outcome was similar, except for a lower insulin requirement. |
Durnwald et al. [25] | Prospective | 107 | T1DM and T2DM | Lispro versus regular | Improved glycemic control and lower total insulin requirements. Perinatal outcomes similar between women treated with both types of insulin. |
Cypryk et al. [27] | Retrospective | 71 | T1DM | Lispro versus regular | Comparable course of pregnancy and the perinatal outcome |
Persson et al. [28] | RCT | 33 | T1DM | Lispro versus regular | Reduced postprandial glycemia after breakfast and slightly higher rate of hypoglycemia |
Batthacharyya et al. [29] | Retrospective | 157 | GDM | Lispro versus regular | Significant decrease in HbA1c levels and greater satisfaction |
Jovanovic et al. [30] | RCT | 42 | GDM | Lispro versus regular | Less hypoglycemic episodes before breakfast; less postprandial hyperglycemia; more reduction in HbA1c levels at the 3rd trimester |