Table 4.
Effects of Maintenance CST on adjusted complete case (CC) outcomes at primary and secondary end points
| |
FU1- 3 month follow up |
FU2- 6 month follow up |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Control | Difference | p value | Treatment | Control | Difference | p value | |||
| Adjusted outcomes |
n |
Mean (SE) |
Mean (SE) |
Mean (SE) |
|
n |
Mean (SE) |
Mean (SE) |
Mean (SE) |
|
| SF-12 PCS |
71 |
39.07 (0.93) |
39.26 (0.97) |
0.19 (1.34) |
.89 |
63 |
37.89 (0.94) |
38.44 (1.02) |
0.55 (1.39) |
.70 |
| SF-12 MCS |
71 |
42.43 (0.76) |
43.04 (0.80) |
0.61 (1.11) |
.58 |
63 |
41.88 (0.85) |
42.91 (0.92) |
1.03 (1.26) |
.42 |
| EQ-5D Utility |
70 |
0.83 (0.02) |
0.81 (0.02) |
−0.02(0.03) |
.52 |
63 |
0.79 (0.02) |
0.84 (0.02) |
0.05 (0.03) |
.12 |
| EQ-5D VAS | 70 | 75.86 (2.05) | 74.04 (2.17) | −1.82 (2.99) | .57 | 63 | 74.41 (2.33) | 72.28 (2.52) | −2.14 (3.43) | .54 |