Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 10;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-25

Table 1.

Lossless compression results

Method
Signal
Arrangement
Muscle
% of MVC
        20% 40% 60% 80%
ZIP
S k
L
UT
17.98 ± 0.59
14.69 ± 0.66
 
 
ZIP
S k
T
UT
19.78 ± 0.51
16.69 ± 0.67
 
 
JPEG
S k
L
UT
36.72 ± 0.77
31.79 ± 0.79
 
 
JPEG
S k
T
UT
36.74 ± 0.77
31.81 ± 0.78
 
 
JPEG
Δk
L
UT
40.86 ± 0.31
38.13 ± 0.40
 
 
JPEG
Δk
T
UT
40.88 ± 0.31
38.15 ± 0.41
 
 
ZIP
S k
L
MG
37.32 ± 0.89
31.73 ± 0.56
27.32 ± 0.63
25.31 ± 0.66
ZIP
S k
T
MG
38.11 ± 0.82
32.94 ± 0.50
28.71 ± 0.59
26.78 ± 0.65
JPEG
S k
L
MG
59.29 ± 1.21
52.52 ± 0.68
47.77 ± 0.59
45.40 ± 0.76
JPEG
S k
T
MG
59.30 ± 1.20
52.53 ± 0.69
47.79 ± 0.59
45.41 ± 0.77
JPEG
Δk
L
MG
58.31 ± 0.72
53.40 ± 0.53
49.88 ± 0.55
48.21 ± 0.67
JPEG Δk T MG 58.31 ± 0.72 53.41 ± 0.53 49.90 ± 0.55 48.22 ± 0.67

Lossless compression of single-differential (Sk) signals and their differences in time (Δk). Mean values ± standard deviation of file-size reduction (%) were computed for 40 epochs per contraction level (% of MVC) of upper trapezius (UT) signals and for 8 epochs per contraction level (% of MVC) of medial gastrocnemius (MG) signals. Arrangements were longitudinal (L) and transversal (T). Methods were ZIP and lossless JPEG.