Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 10;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-25

Table 2.

Lossy compression results

Method
Mus.
Arr.
Var.
MVC
        10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
ACELP
BB
L
FSR (%)
87.3
 
87.3
 
 
87.3
87.3
 
[10]
 
 
SNR (dB)
10.38
 
11.81
 
 
12.25
12.79
 
JPEG
UT
L
FSR (%)
 
87.5 ± 0.5
 
87.1 ± 0.4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
17.17 ± 0.74
 
18.63 ± 0.86
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MAE (A.U.)
 
134.7 ± 10.4
 
168.0 ± 13.8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
q
 
15
 
10
 
 
 
 
JPEG
UT
T
FSR (%)
 
87.3 ± 0.4
 
87.2 ± 0.4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
19.15 ± 0.78
 
20.45 ± 0.80
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MAE (A.U.)
 
109.3 ± 10.5
 
147.3 ± 22.8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
q
 
19
 
13
 
 
 
 
JPEG
MG
L
FSR (%)
 
87.3 ± 0.6
 
87.3 ± 0.4
 
87.3 ± 0.3
 
87.3 ± 0.4
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
19.48 ± 0.42
 
19.98 ± 0.49
 
21.88 ± 0.59
 
23.33 ± 0.84
 
 
 
MAE (A.U.)
 
25.4 ± 1.7
 
43.9 ± 5.7
 
63.0 ± 6.6
 
78.5 ± 5.4
 
 
 
q
 
71
 
47
 
31
 
24
JPEG
MG
T
FSR (%)
 
87.3 ± 0.5
 
87.3 ± 0.3
 
87.3 ± 0.3
 
87.2 ± 0.5
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
19.92 ± 0.37
 
20.99 ± 0.50
 
22.95 ± 0.58
 
24.24 ± 0.85
 
 
 
MAE (A.U.)
 
21.4 ± 2.2
 
35.9 ± 2.0
 
51.8 ± 4.6
 
62.0 ± 5.3
 
 
 
q
 
73
 
52
 
34
 
26
IC [25]
BB
L
FSR (%)
 
 
 
 
89.6
 
 
 
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
 
 
 
15.58
 
 
 
JPEG
UT
L
FSR (%)
 
89.6 ± 0.4
 
89.5 ± 0.4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
15.81 ± 0.72
 
17.17 ± 0.87
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MAE (A.U.)
 
160.5 ± 13.6
 
189.5 ± 17.8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
q
 
10
 
06
 
 
 
 
JPEG
UT
T
FSR (%)
 
89.5 ± 0.4
 
89.6 ± 0.4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
17.66 ± 0.75
 
18.87 ± 0.82
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MAE (A.U.)
 
129.4 ± 12.7
 
170.0 ± 26.1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
q
 
13
 
08
 
 
 
 
JPEG
MG
L
FSR (%)
 
89.6 ± 0.5
 
89.5 ± 0.3
 
89.7 ± 0.3
 
89.5 ± 0.4
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
17.84 ± 0.42
 
18.39 ± 0.49
 
20.09 ± 0.58
 
21.63 ± 0.83
 
 
 
MAE (A.U.)
 
30.8 ± 2.3
 
60.0 ± 7.2
 
78.3 ± 8.5
 
94.6 ± 8.3
 
 
 
q
 
57
 
32
 
20
 
16
JPEG
MG
T
FSR (%)
 
89.6 ± 0.4
 
89.6 ± 0.3
 
89.7 ± 0.3
 
89.5 ± 0.4
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
18.37 ± 0.37
 
19.39 ± 0.50
 
21.14 ± 0.55
 
22.36 ± 0.83
 
 
 
MAE (A.U.)
 
26.4 ± 2.0
 
39.6 ± 1.6
 
67.5 ± 5.7
 
75.4 ± 6.8
 
 
 
q
 
60
 
35
 
22
 
17
SP [25]
BB
 
FSR (%)
 
 
 
 
91.0
 
 
 
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
 
 
 
15.55
 
 
 
STP[25]
BB
 
FSR (%)
 
 
 
 
91.0
 
 
 
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
 
 
 
18.96
 
 
 
JPEG
UT
L
FSR (%)
 
91.1 ± 0.4
 
90.9 ± 0.4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
14.72 ± 0.71
 
15.94 ± 0.87
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MAE (A.U.)
 
176.7 ± 13.8
 
212.2 ± 12.9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
q
 
7
 
4
 
 
 
 
JPEG
UT
T
FSR (%)
 
91.2 ± 0.4
 
90.8 ± 0.4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
16.44 ± 0.75
 
17.94 ± 0.83
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MAE (A.U.)
 
148.6 ± 12.6
 
179.5 ± 19.0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
q
 
9
 
6
 
 
 
 
JPEG
MG
L
FSR (%)
 
91.0 ± 0.5
 
91.0 ± 0.3
 
91.1 ± 0.3
 
90.9 ± 0.4
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
16.74 ± 0.42
 
17.23 ± 0.48
 
18.92 ± 0.59
 
20.39 ± 0.83
 
 
 
MAE (A.U.)
 
38.4 ± 3.9
 
61.0 ± 4.1
 
91.0 ± 9.8
 
113.5 ± 10.3
 
 
 
q
 
44
 
24
 
15
 
12
JPEG
MG
T
FSR (%)
 
91.0 ± 0.4
 
90.9 ± 0.3
 
90.9 ± 0.3
 
90.8 ± 0.4
 
 
 
SNR (dB)
 
17.34 ± 0.37
 
18.34 ± 0.49
 
20.03 ± 0.55
 
21.19 ± 0.82
 
 
 
MAE (A.U.)
 
30.3 ± 3.2
 
48.5 ± 3.0
 
70.5 ± 5.4
 
83.4 ± 4.8
      q   48   27   17   13

File size reduction (FSR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), maximum absolute error (MAE) and quality (q) for lossy compression. Literature values reported in [10] are shown for biceps brachii (BB). Mean values ± standard deviation were computed for 40 epochs per contraction level (% of MVC) of upper trapezius (UT) signals and for 8 epochs per contraction level (% of MVC) of medial gastrocnemius (MG) signals. Arrangements were longitudinal (L) and transversal (T).