Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 26;9:66. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-66

Table 2.

Summary comparison of VMAT and HT plans

Structure/Item Metric VMAT HT p -value
PTV
DV95% (Gy)
49.3 ± 0.1
49.8 ± 0.1
<0.001
DHI
0.147 ± 0.009
0.096 ± 0.005
<0.001
CI
0.778 ± 0.008
0.719 ± 0.008
<0.001
TCP
99.8 ± 0.2
100 ± 0.0
0.002
Total lung
V5Gy (%)
66.2 ± 3.1
89.8 ± 1.4
<0.001
V20Gy (%)
16.3 ± 0.2
15.0 ± 0.3
<0.001
NTCP (%)
0.3 ± 0.1
0.6 ± 0.1
0.06
SCCP (%)
5.3 ± 0.1
6.1 ± 0.0**
<0.001
Ipsilateral lung
V5Gy (%)
96.9 ± 1.3
99.3 ± 0.5
0.06
V20Gy (%)
32.3 ± 0.8
29.9 ± 1.0
<0.001
Contralateral lung
V5Gy (%)
37.8 ± 4.9
81.7 ± 2.5
<0.001
Heart*
V15Gy (%)
26.0 ± 1.9
28.2 ± 2.6
0.4
Dmean (Gy)
12.9 ± 0.5
14.4 ± 0.6
0.04
Dmax (Gy)
42.2 ± 1.6
38.3 ± 1.3
<0.001
NTCP (%)
1.3 ± 0.2
0.9 ± 0.1
0.008
Contralateral breast
Mean dose (Gy)
1.5 ± 0.1
1.8 ± 0.1
<0.001
SCCP (%)
1.0 ± 0.0**
1.2 ± 0.0**
<0.001
Non-specific normal tissue
Mean dose (Gy)
7.0 ± 0.2
11.1 ± 0.4
<0.001
SCCP (%)
0.7 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.0**
<0.001
Efficiency Delivery time (s) 128.6 ± 2.8 382.4 ± 10.9 <0.001

Values shown are averages of the 15 patients (± 1σ) with the exception of the heart.

*Patients with right-side mastectomy excluded.

**Standard deviation of the mean < 0.05.

Abbreviations: PTV planning target volume, DHI dose homogeneity index (ideal = 0), CI conformity index (ideal = 1), TCP tumor control probability, NTCP normal tissue complication probability, SCCP secondary cancer complication probability.