Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 18;106(6):1309–1317. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.01.039

Table 1.

Distances of close approach, L, that yield the best fit of the model to the experimental data

Data set L (nm)a L (nm)b
ErbB1 15aa 3.0 ± 0.4 2.8 ± 0.4
ErbB2 15aa 3.8 ± 0.4 3.8 ± 0.2
ErbB1-FGFR1 2.6 ± 0.4 2.2 ± 0.4
Average 3.2 ± 0.6 3.0 ± 0.6
Fit to all data 3.0 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.2
a

Our model, given by Eqs. 6, 8, and 9.

b

Model of Snyder and Freire (19), given by Eqs. 6–8.