Skip to main content
. 2014 May;4(5):354–357. doi: 10.12980/APJTB.4.2014C1206

Table 4. Number and frequency (%) of each serovar, in different farms.

G
P
I
C
H
Total
N F(%) N F(%) N F(%) N F(%) N F(%) N F(%)
Farm 1 1 0.60 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.0 1 0.60
Farm 2 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.0 0 0.00
Farm 3 1 0.60 3 1.80 0 0 3 1.80 0 0.0 7 4.20
Farm 4 2 1.20 2 1.20 0 0 0 0.00 1 0.6 5 3.00
Farm 5 3 1.80 3 1.80 0 0 1 0.60 0 0.0 7 4.20
Farm 6 1 0.60 2 1.20 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.0 3 1.80
Farm 7 1 0.60 2 1.20 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.0 3 1.80
Farm 8 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.0 0 0.00
Farm 9 1 0.60 1 0.60 0 0 0 0.00 1 0.6 3 1.80
Total 10 5.98 13 7.78 0 0 4 2.39 2 1.2 29 17.36

G: L. grippotyphosa, P: L. pomona, I: L. icterohaemorrhagiae, C: L. canicola, H: L. hardjo, N: number and F: frequency