Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 16;6(4):128–136. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i4.128

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of E.G. Scan™ compared to conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Prevalence % (95%CI) Sensitivity % (95%CI) Specificity % (95%CI) PPV % (95%CI) NPV % (95%CI) Accuracy % (95%CI)
Erosive GERD 30.1 (21.5-40.6) 44.8 (27-64) 91 (80.9-96.3) 68.4 (43.5-86.4) 79.2 (68.2-87.3) 77.1 (67.2-84.8)
Barrett’s esophagus 12.5 (6.9-21.2) 66.7 (35.4-88.7) 95 (87.6-98.5) 66.7 (35.4-88.7) 95.2 (87.6-98.5) 91.7 (83.8-96.1)
Esophageal varices 21.8 (14.4-31.7) 95.2 (74.1-99.8) 97.3 (89.8-99.5) 90.9 (69.3-98.4) 98.6 (91.7-99.9) 96.8 (90.5-99.1)
Hiatal Hernia 34.4 (25.1-44.8) 39.4 (23.4-57.7) 88.9 (77.8-95) 65 (41-83.7) 73.7 (62.1-82.8) 71.9 (61.6-80.3)

PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value; GERD: Gastroesophageal reflux disease.