Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 30;2014:103054. doi: 10.1155/2014/103054

Table 1.

Successful testing classification rate and standard derivation (rate (%) ± Dev (%)) comparisons of different classifiers: fixed protein sequence training dataset (pir1) and testing dataset (pir2), where L, S, and G stand for the linear kernel, the sigmoid kernel, and the Gaussian kernel, respectively.

Methods L S G
VOP-ELM 92.51 ± 0 92.64 ± 1.6 93.69 ± 0.89
V-ELM 87.45 ± 0.01 90.14 ± 0.71 90.46 ± 0.69
OP-ELM 91.39 ± 0.01 91.51 ± 1.0 92.28 ± 0.70
SVM 90.63 ± 0.01 90.63 ± 0.01 90.63 ± 0.01
BP 85.77 ± 0.42 88.39 ± 1.69 88.77 ± 1.35
ELM 85.39 ± 0 87.66 ± 1.2 87.80 ± 1.4