Table 4. Accuracy of ΔGpol Estimated by CHA–GB and GB Based on Their Respective Optimal Atomic Radii (Table 3)a.
small
molecules |
amino
acid analogs |
proteins |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GB | CHA–GB | GB | CHA–GB | GB | CHA–GB | |
rmse | 1.24 | 0.88 | 1.26 | 0.81 | 10.24 | 8.95 |
⟨err⟩ | –0.53 | –0.37 | 0.24 | 0.09 | –6.12 | –2.80 |
⟨|err|⟩ | 0.93 | 0.63 | 0.90 | 0.64 | 7.79 | 7.63 |
r2 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
%(|err| > 2kBT) | 30.6 | 14.9 | 25.0 | 16.7 | 84.2 | 89.5 |
rmse worst 5% | 3.20 | 2.55 | 4.14 | 2.11 | 25.53 | 16.20 |
The accuracy is assessed relative to explicit solvent (TIP3P) ΔGpol (kcal/mol): root mean square error (rmse), mean error (⟨err⟩), mean absolute error ⟨|err|⟩, r2 correlation, percentage of molecules with absolute error >2kBT, and rmse of the 5% molecules with largest |err|.