Table 2.
Mammography screening |
Intervention | Significance | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Low Intensity Intervention |
High Intensity Intervention |
||
(1) | (1)+(2) | (1)+(2)+(3) | ||
(n = 167) N (%) |
(n = 166) N (%) |
(n = 167) N (%) |
||
Self report | ||||
Had a mammogram in the past 6 months |
12/156 (7.7) | 79/153 (51.6) | 103/153 (67.3) | a,b,c |
Electronic record | ||||
Had a mammogram in the past 6 months (intention to treat) |
10/167 (6.0) | 86/166 (51.8) | 117/167 (70.1) | a,b,c |
(1) Opportunistic screening: brief advice
(2) Mail contact
(3) Personal contact: telephone contact or home visit
p value < 0.05 for low intensity intervention vs. control
p value < 0.05 for high intensity intervention vs. control
p value < 0.05 for low intensity intervention vs. high intensity intervention
kappa for electronic record and self report: 0.8