Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 14.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Sep;19(9):2254–2261. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0313

Table 2.

Mammography screening behavior

Mammography
screening
Intervention Significance

Control Low Intensity
Intervention
High Intensity
Intervention
(1) (1)+(2) (1)+(2)+(3)

(n = 167)
N (%)
(n = 166)
N (%)
(n = 167)
N (%)
Self report
Had a mammogram in the
past 6 months
12/156 (7.7) 79/153 (51.6) 103/153 (67.3) a,b,c
Electronic record
Had a mammogram in the
past 6 months
(intention to treat)
10/167 (6.0) 86/166 (51.8) 117/167 (70.1) a,b,c

(1) Opportunistic screening: brief advice

(2) Mail contact

(3) Personal contact: telephone contact or home visit

a

p value < 0.05 for low intensity intervention vs. control

b

p value < 0.05 for high intensity intervention vs. control

c

p value < 0.05 for low intensity intervention vs. high intensity intervention

kappa for electronic record and self report: 0.8