Table 2.

Comparison of Median VAS (25,75 IQR) between Subject, Investigator, and Video Reviewers

	Painease® n=49	Ice n=45	p value
Subject VAS-S
Baseline	35 (2, 69)	22 (0, 62)	p=0.18
Treatment	4 (1, 19)	15 (2, 32)	p=0.13
IV Placement	9 (2, 24)	13 (3, 42)	p=0.08
Investigator VAS-I
Baseline	4 (2, 11)	3 (0, 5)	p=0.0398
Treatment	1 (0, 3)	3 (0, 11)	p=0.0477
IV Placement	2 (0, 7)	4 (2, 16)	p=0.0086
Video Reviewers *
IV Placement	0.5 (0, 7)	2 (0, 6.5)	p=0.25
Subject Δ VAS-S
Δ Treatment - Baseline	−20 (−60, 1)	0 (−28, 10)	p=0.0356
Δ IV - Baseline	−20 (−56, 0)	0 (−38, 19)	p=0.0127
Δ IV - Baseline	0 (−8, 9)	2 (−11, 12)	p=0.77

^*For video reviewers Painease^® n=34, Ice n=32