Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 12;144(5):777–783. doi: 10.3945/jn.113.187823

TABLE 3.

Applications of the DLW method in the CALERIE clinical trial among study participants who were randomly assigned to the caloric restriction intervention1

Nutrition applications Mean values
CR prescription
 EIAL, kcal·d−1 2467 ± 443 (1883–3225)
 Prescription, kcal·d−1 1803 ± 325 (1400–2346)
Adherence monitoring (baseline to 6 mo)
 Prescription, kcal·d−1 1803 ± 325 (1400–2346)
 EIP, kcal·d−1 1696 ± 341 (1254–2393)
 ΔES, kcal·d−1 −363 ± 126 (−614 to −219)
 EIAL, kcal·d−1 2467 ± 443 (1883–3225)
 %CR, % 31 ± 5 (25–38)
Body compositional changes (baseline to 6 mo)
 NO at baseline, kg 36.2 ± 7.8 (26.1–48.0)
 TBW at baseline, kg 35.8 ± 7.7 (25.9–47.6)
 FFM at baseline, kg 49.1 ± 10.6 (35.4–65.2)
 FM at baseline, kg 26.5 ± 5.9 (19.0–34.4)
 ΔNO, kg −0.8 ± 1.1 (−2.5–0.8)
 ΔFFM, kg −1.0 ± 1.5 (−3.3–1.0)
 ΔFM, kg −8.6 ± 3.4 (−15.2 to −4.6)
1

Values are means ± SDs (ranges), n = 10. CALERIE, Comprehensive Assessment of Long-term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy; CR, caloric restriction; DLW, doubly labeled water; EIAL, ad libitum energy intake; EIp, energy intake over the period of interest; FM, fat mass; FFM, fat-free mass; NO, isotope dilution space of 18O; TBW, total body water; %CR, percentage of CR achieved; ΔES, change in body energy stores; ΔFM, change in FM; ΔFFM, change in FFM; ΔNO, change in the isotope dilution space of 18O.