. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 14.

Published in final edited form as: NMR Biomed. 2007 Jun;20(4):429–438. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1107

Table 1.

Measured values for CBV/CBF of a 32-year-old subject with R = 4. CBV values are in ml/100 g, CBF values are in ml/100 g/min. The AIF, calculated by the maximum strategy described in the text, was the same for all rows. The error interval is the standard deviation within the ROIs

Echo/fit	CBV_GM	CBV_WM	CBF_GM	CBF_WM
TE = 12.4	10.8 ± 11.2	6.8 ± 5.0	245 ± 202	118 ± 78
TE = 27.3	14.3 ± 10.8	7.7 ± 5.2	221 ± 147	104 ± 67
TE = 42.2	14.8 ± 9.9	8.0 ± 5.0	211 ± 132	102 ± 65
TE = 57.1	14.8 ± 8.9	8.1 ± 4.8	206 ± 122	99 ± 63
w = 0	16.0 ± 9.3	8.5 ± 5.2	199 ± 114	100 ± 62
w = 1	16.1 ± 9.6	8.5 ± 5.3	197 ± 114	99 ± 62
w = 2	16.2 ± 10.0	8.5 ± 5.5	198 ± 118	101 ± 62