Table 1.
Clinical sample description.
| Age | Years of schooling | Sex | Frequency of R/W | SES | MMSE | Time since lesion | Hemisphere | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRONTAL STROKE | ||||||||
| 1. A. F. L. | 54 | 11 | F | High | A2 | 28 | 1 | L |
| 2. A. C. | 60 | 11 | M | Low | B2 | 28 | 15 | R |
| 3. E. A | 65 | 10 | F | High | B1 | 27 | 6 | L |
| 4. M. C. C. | 56 | 8 | F | Low | C2 | 23 | 32 | R |
| 5. M. C. C. | 74 | 10 | F | Low | B2 | 19 | 4 | R |
| 6. P. F. S. | 46 | 9 | M | High | A2 | 25 | 11 | L |
| 7. P. J. | 47 | 15 | M | High | B2 | 29 | 12 | L |
| 8. S. S. L. | 58 | 11 | F | Low | B1 | 23 | 7 | R |
| 9. Z. O. | 59 | 17 | M | High | A2 | 25 | 8 | R |
| M (SD) | 57.7 (8.62) | 11.3 (2.87) | 13.5 (9.34) | 28.6 (6.70) | 25.2 (3.19) | 10.7 (9.06) | ||
| CEREBELLAR STROKE | ||||||||
| 1. A. F. | 73 | 7 | F | Low | C1 | 19 | 12 | L |
| 2. D. R. V. | 59 | 11 | F | High | C1 | 28 | 10 | L |
| 3. E. E. R. | 57 | 11 | M | High | B2 | 30 | 4 | L |
| 4. I. R. M. | 73 | 5 | F | Low | B2 | 24 | 10 | L |
| 5. I. S. P. | 56 | 8 | F | Low | C1 | 26 | 5 | R |
| 6. J. R. B. | 61 | 14 | M | High | B2 | 26 | 3 | Bilateral |
| 7. S. C. | 52 | 10 | F | Low | C1 | 25 | 8 | R |
| 8. U. C. | 67 | 17 | M | High | A2 | 27 | 33 | R |
| 9. V. C. | 79 | 4 | M | Low | B2 | 29 | 12 | L |
| M (SD) | 64.1 (6.27) | 9.67 (4.18) | 12.8 (4.85) | 24.67 (6.12) | 26 (3.24) | 10.8 (8.98) | ||
M, mean; SD, standard deviation; F, female; M, male; R/W, reading and writing; MMSE, Mini Mental State Examination; SES, Socioeconomic Status; L, left; R, right; 55.5% of patients were diagnosed through computerized tomography and 44.4% through magnetic resonance imaging. Specific data describing the location of the lesion was obtained for one participant (U. C.—hypodensity in the right cerebellar hemisphere on the lateral Wall of the fourth ventricle), while the remaining participants' exams only pointed to a general location within the affected lobe.