Table 2.
Logistic regression: factors that determine workplace bullying.
| Variables | Odds Ratios | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| 1. Factors at a personal and familiar level | |||
| Gender (0: male; 1: female) | 0.600 | 0.471 | 0.545 |
| Education (0: higher education; 1: secondary or lower | 0.331 | n.s. | n.s. |
| Status (0: partnered; 1: single) | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| Children under 15 at home (0: Yes; 1: No) | 0.524 | 0.554 | 0.653 |
| 2. Working conditions | |||
| Work at night (0: No; 1: Yes) | 0.701 | 0.706 | |
| Work on Sundays (0: No; 1: Yes) | n.s. | n.s. | |
| More than 10 working hours a day (0: No; 1: Yes) | n.s. | n.s. | |
| Shift work (0: No; 1: Yes) | n.s. | 0.669 | |
| Capacity to decide timetable (0: Flexibility; 1: No flexibility) | 0.499 | n.s. | |
| Harmony between working hours and personal matters (0: Yes; 1: No) | n.s. | n.s. | |
| Complex tasks (0: Yes; 1: No) | n.s. | n.s. | |
| Rotating tasks (0: Yes; 1: No) | n.s. | n.s. | |
| Autonomy on the content (0: Yes; 1: No) | n.s. | n.s. | |
| Emotional involvement (0: Yes; 1:No) | n.s. | n.s. | |
| Work stress (0: No; 1: Yes) | 1.295 | 1.537 | |
| Working condition satisfaction (0: Yes; 1: No) | 1.361 | 1.265 | |
| Payment satisfaction (0: Yes; 1: No) | 1.247 | 1.068 | |
| Likely to be dismissed (0: No; 1: Yes) | n.s. | n.s. | |
| Promotion opportunities (0: Yes; 1: No) | n.s. | 0.545 | |
| Motivation (0: Yes; 1: No) | n.s. | n.s. | |
| 3. Organizational context | |||
| Type of sector (0: Private; 1: Public) | n.s. | ||
| Constant | −0.613 | −2.835 | −3.106 |
| χ2 Efficiency test—Added category | 25.435 | 133.84 | 1.864 |
| Degrees of freedom | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| Level of significance | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| χ2 Efficiency test—Global Model | 25.435 | 159.275 | 161.139 |
| Degrees of freedom | 3 | 7 | 8 |
| Level of significance | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| % Correct prediction | |||
| Global | 58.6 | 72.5 | 74.8 |
| Bullied | 59.8 | 74.0 | 78.4 |
| Non-bullied | 57.5 | 70.4 | 70.9 |