Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 27;3(2):245–251. doi: 10.1002/cam4.189

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate regression analyses.

Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
No. of patients (%) Hazard ratio 95% CI P-value Hazard ratio 95% CI P-value
Time to CRPC 84 (100)
 HIF1α inhibitor 0.37 (0.18–0.76) 0.007 0.29 (0.10–0.78) 0.016
 Gleason score 1.35 (1.04–1.74) 0.024 1.31 (0.99–1.72) 0.057
 Age 0.96 (0.93–1.00) 0.014 1.00 (0.98–1.04) 0.553
 PSA 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.370 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.403
Time to metastases 46 (54)
 HIF1α inhibitor 0.29 (0.11–0.77) 0.013 0.19 (0.05–0.76) 0.019
 Gleason score 1.44 (1.03–2.01) 0.035 1.50 (1.05–2.13) 0.025
 Age 0.97 (0.93–1.01) 0.220 1.00 (0.96–1.06) 0.866
 PSA 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.947 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.284

CRPC, castrate-resistant prostate cancer; HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor; PSA, prostate-specific antigen. Cox proportional univariate analyses of time to castrate resistance and time to metastases are presented. Multivariate regression analyses adjusting for each of the other factors are also presented. Fourteen men (14.3%) were excluded from the analysis as they had missing data.