Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 25;11:27. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-11-27

Table 2.

Post hoc comparison and effect size statistics of original trials (head-bobbing; HB), simulated trials without head-bobbing (no HB), and simulated trials in which the timing of head-bobbing was inversed (inv. HB)

  Mean difference 95% CI of mean difference Significance (Dunnett’s t ) Effect size (Cohen’s d )
Vertical displacement of the head
Vaulting
 
 
 
 
No HB vs. HB
–0.9214 cm
± 0.3319
0.842
0.22
Inv. HB vs. HB
0.3787 cm
± 0.3319
0.021*
0.82
CoM vs. HB
–0.2762 cm
± 0.3320
0.123
0.69
Bouncing
 
 
 
 
No HB vs. HB
0.3389 cm
± 0.3131
0.03*
0.91
Inv. HB vs. HB
1.3145 cm
± 0.3131
< 0.001***
1.95
CoM vs. HB
0.5885 cm
± 0.3132
0.944
0.20
 
 
 
 
 
Amplitude of E p fluctuation
Vaulting
 
 
 
 
No HB vs. HB
0.3639 mJ
± 3.7318
0.964
0.08
Inv. HB vs. HB
0.8127 mJ
± 3.7319
0.837
0.18
Bouncing
 
 
 
 
No HB vs. HB
0.9257 mJ
± 2.1613
0.530
0.24
Inv. HB vs. HB
2.8846 mJ
± 2.1614
0.096
0.48
 
 
 
 
 
Amplitude of E k fluctuation
 
 
 
Vaulting
 
 
 
 
No HB vs. HB
–1.9423 mJ
± 4.3011
0.486
0.35
Inv. HB vs. HB
–3.4037 mJ
± 4.3012
0.137
0.67
Bouncing
 
 
 
 
No HB vs. HB
–2.2789 mJ
± 2.9916
0.159
0.38
Inv. HB vs. HB –2.0391 mJ ± 2.9915 0.223 0.36

*: significant at the p = 0.05 level; ***: significant at the p = 0.001 level.