Table 2.

School factors associated with grade 7-12 students’ sugar-sweetened beverage consumption (N = 10879) and food consumption index (N = 10735)

			Sugar-sweetened beverage		Food consumption index (n = 10496)
			None versus one (n = 9518)	None versus 2+ (n = 7247)
			OR [95% CI], p-value	OR [95% CI], p-value	b [95% CI], p-value
Constant			-	-	4.48 [3.59; 5.37], p < .001
Covariates
School postsecondary education			0.89 [0.81–0.96], p = .01	0.84 [0.71–0.99], p = .048	0.12 [0.01; 0.23], p = .04
School setting		Urban (reference)	1.00	1.00	1.00
		Suburban	1.15 [0.91–1.41], p = .19	1.09 [0.76–1.54], p = .64	0.03 [-0.23; 0.29], p = .83
		Rural	1.01 [0.85–1.21], p = .89	1.11 [0.80–1.52], p = .54	0.04 [-0.21; 0.28], p = .77
Age			0.98 [0.95–1.01], p = .17	1.01 [0.96–1.05], p = .77	0.02 [-0.02; 0.05], p = .33
Sex		Male (reference)	1.00	1.00	1.00
		Female	0.49 [0.45–0.54], p < .001	0.28 [0.24–0.33], p < .001	0.51 [0.42; 0.60], p < .001
School environment
Policy institutionalization – district guidelines			1.08 [0.90–1.28], p = .44	0.98 [0.70–1.35], p = .88	-0.09 [-0.31; 0.14], p = .44
Policy institutionalization – school nutrition practices			0.65 [0.48–0.88], p = .01	0.69 [0.41–1.15], p = .16	0.23 [-0.12; 0.58], p = .19
Capacity & resources	Nutritional resources		1.01 [0.88–1.16], p = .90	0.99 [0.76–1.27], p = .91	-0.06 [-0.24; 0.12], p = .53
	Program participation	None (reference)	1.00	1.00	1.00
		1 program	0.96 [0.84–1.08], p = .48	0.96 [0.73–1.26], p = .77	0.01 [-0.18; 0.20], p = .93
		2 programs	0.97 [0.76–1.23], p = .81	0.88 [0.75–1.26], p = .49	0.07 [-0.15; 0.29], p = .54
Internal and external support			0.91 [0.78–1.06], p = .25	1.08 [0.78–1.48], p = .65	-0.03 [-0.24; 0.19], p = .80
Sugar-sweetened beverages availability		No (reference)	1.00	1.00	NA
		Yes	1.15 [1.02–1.30], p = .02	1.43 [1.13–1.80], p = .003	NA
Food availability index			NA	NA	0.02 [-0.02; 0.05], p = .41

OR = Odds ratio; CI = Confidence Interval; b = non-standardized parameter estimate.