Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 26;11:29. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-29

Table 3.

School factors and grade 7-12 students’ food/beverage consumption associated with Body Mass Index (normal versus overweight) (N = 8995)

 
Model 1 (n = 8834)
Model 2 (n = 8361)
Model 3 (n = 8209)
  OR [95% CI], p-value OR [95% CI], p-value OR [95% CI], p-value
Covariates
School postsecondary education
0.90 [0.79–1.02], p = .09
0.92 [0.80–1.04], p = .19
0.90 [0.79–1.03], p = .11
School setting
Urban (reference)
1.00
1.00
1.00
Suburban
1.41 [1.13–1.77], p = .003
1.45 [1.13–1.86], p = .003
1.37 [1.07–1.73], p = .01
Rural
1.41 [1.14–1.73], p = .002
1.44 [1.14–1.82], p = .003
1.41 [1.13–1.77], p = .003
Age
1.03 [0.99–1.07], p = .17
1.04 [0.99–1.07], p = .09
1.04 [1.00–1.08], p = .05
Sex
Male (reference)
1.00
1.00
1.00
Female
0.47 [0.41–0.53], p < .001
0.47 [0.41–0.53], p < .001
0.46 [0.41–0.53], p < .001
School environment
Policy institutionalization – district guidelines
0.92 [0.73–1.15], p = .45
-
0.92 [0.73–1.16], p = .49
Policy institutionalization – school nutrition practices
1.16 [0.79–1.67], p = .46
-
1.23 [0.84–1.80], p = .30
Capacity and resources
Nutritional resources
0.85 [0.72–1.02], p = .08
-
0.85 [0.70–1.02], p = .08
Program participation
None (reference)
1.00
-
1.00
1 program
1.03 [0.83–1.28], p = .78
-
1.02 [0.82–1.27], p = .87
2 programs
1.10 [0.83–1.46], p = .49
-
1.14 [0.84–1.54], p = .37
Internal and external support
0.90 [0.73–1.12], p = .35
-
0.88 [0.71–1.11], p = .28
Sugar-sweetened beverages availability
No (reference)
1.00
-
1.00
Yes
1.16 [0.97–1.39], p = .10
-
1.13 [0.94–1.36], p = .20
Food availability index
1.00 [0.96–1.04], p = .99
-
1.00 [0.96–1.04], p = .86
Student consumption
Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption
None (reference)
-
1.00
1.00
1 yesterday
-
1.13 [0.98–1.31], p = .10
1.13 [0.97–1.31], p = .12
2+ yesterday
-
1.12 [0.90–1.39], p = .32
1.13 [0.90–1.40], p = .29
Food consumption index - 1.03 [1.00–1.06], p = .02 1.03 [1.01–1.06], p = .02

OR = Odds Ratio; CI = Confidence Interval.