Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 26;11:29. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-29

Table 4.

School factors and grade 7-12 students’ beverage/food consumption associated with Body Mass Index (normal versus obese) (N = 8172)

 
Model 1 (n = 8018)
Model 2 (n = 7604)
Model 3 (n = 7458)
  OR [95% CI], p-value OR [95% CI], p-value OR [95% CI], p-value
Covariates
School postsecondary education
1.00 [0.83–1.20], p = .98
1.00 [0.81–1.23], p = .98
0.98 [0.80–1.20], p = .84
School setting
Urban (reference)
1.00
1.00
1.00
Suburban
1.53 [1.06–2.23], p = .02
1.67 [1.15–2.44], p = .01
1.52 [1.35–2.23], p = .04
Rural
1.94 [1.40–1.11], p < .001
2.01 [1.39–2.89], p < .001
1.89 [1.03–2.66], p < .001
Age
1.06 [0.99–1.14], p = .09
1.07 [1.00–1.14], p = .06
1.06 [0.99–1.14], p = .10
Sex
Male (reference)
1.00
1.00
1.00
Female
0.47[0.38–0.59], p < .001
0.51[0.40–0.64], p < .001
0.51[0.40–0.64], p < .001
School environment
Policy institutionalization – district guidelines
0.87 [0.62–1.23], p = .44
-
0.85 [0.59–1.21], p = .36
Policy institutionalization – school nutrition practices
1.23 [0.66–2.29], p = .50
-
1.15 [0.59–2.23], p = .67
Capacity and resources
Nutritional resources
1.03 [0.77–1.36], p = .85
-
0.97 [0.73–1.31], p = .89
Program participation
None (reference)
1.00
-
1.00
1 program
1.22 [0.88–1.68], p = .23
-
1.20 [0.86–1.67], p = .27
2 programs
0.89 [0.52–1.52], p = .65
-
0.99 [0.57–1.72], p = .96
Internal and external support
0.78 [0.56–1.07], p = .13
-
0.74 [0.53–1.04], p = .08
Sugar-sweetened beverages availability
No (reference)
1.00
-
1.00
Yes
1.58 [1.20–2.10], p = .001
-
1.50 [1.12–2.01], p = .01
Food availability index
1.03 [0.97–1.09], p = .32
-
1.03 [0.97–1.11], p = .29
Student consumption
Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption
None (reference)
-
1.00
1.00
1 yesterday
-
1.26 [0.98–1.62], p = .07
1.19 [0.92–1.54], p = .18
2+ yesterday
-
1.69 [1.20–2.36], p = .003
1.66 [1.19–2.34], p = .003
Food consumption index - 1.04 [0.99–1.08], p = .15 1.03 [0.98–1.08], p = .27

OR = Odds ratio; CI = Confidence Interval.