Skip to main content
. 2013;5(1):33–43.

Table IV. Comparison of two RCT’s on acupuncture (AP) as an adjunct treatment option for PGP.

Author Elden et al. 2008a Elden et al. 2008b
Methods Single blind RCT Double blind RCT
6 weeks of treatment (2x/week) 8 weeks of treatment (12 sessions)
386 ♀ (2nd trim. pregn.) 115 ♀ (2nd trim. pregn.; VAS for pain > 5)
Control Group (CG) Information on pelvic anatomy; pelvic belt exercise of abdominal-, back-, gluteal- and shoulder muscles (= standard treatment ST) n = 130 ST + non-penetrating sham AP n = 57
Intervention Group (IG) ST + AP (n = 125) ST + AP
ST + stabilizing exercise (n = 131) n = 58
Outcome Neonatal and maternal adverse events measured by: CTG, birth weight, cord-blood gas, Apgar, gestational age, duration labour, analgesia during labour, use of oxytocin, caesarian Pain, sick leave, discomfort of PGP, health-related quality of live, recovery, functional status
Results No neonatal or maternal adverse events No sign. ↓ pain in both groups Sign.
Minor adverse effects (headache, drowsiness, rash, pain from needles, unpleasantness, severe nausea, sweating and dizziness) ↓ number of sick leave in IG Sign.
Interventions are sign. ↑ rated as ‘helpful’ ↑ ability to do daily activities in IG
No sign. difference between 1 or 2 No sign. differences in quality of life, discomfort of PGP and recovery