Table 4.
Principal Recipient communication and relationship with other Global Fund actors
| |
Respondents who agreed with the statement |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statement area | Overall number (%) | Government number (%) | Non-govt number (%) | Overall | SS Africa number (%) | Other countries number (%) |
|
Adequacy of communication with other actors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Organization has adequate communication with FPM (n=105) |
91 (86) |
23 (82) |
68 (88) |
84 (87) |
35 (80) |
49 (92) |
| Organization has adequate communication with CCM (n=105) |
76 (73) |
24 (86) |
52 (68) |
72 (74) |
29 (66) |
43 (81) |
| Organization has adequate communication with LFA (n=105) |
87 (82) |
25 (89) |
62 (81) |
83 (86) |
37 (84) |
46 (87) |
| Organization has adequate communication with SRs (n=91) |
84 (92) |
21 (92) |
63 (93) |
81 (93) |
35 (90) |
46 (95) |
|
Response time to queries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FPM responds to queries in a timely manner (n=104) |
74 (71) |
15 (56) |
59 (76) |
69 (72) |
25 (59) |
44 (83) |
| CCM responds to queries in a timely manner (n=105) |
54 (51) |
17 (61) |
37 (48) |
50 (51) |
18 (41) |
32 (60) |
| LFA responds to queries in a timely manner (n=105) |
61 (58) |
17 (61) |
44 (57) |
59 (60) |
20 (46) |
39 (73) |
| SRs responds to queries in a timely manner (n=91) |
61 (67) |
13 (57) |
48 (71) |
60 (69) |
21 (54) |
39 (81) |
|
Overall nature of the working relationship |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Organization has good relations with the FPM (n=104) |
88 (84) |
22 (82) |
66 (86) |
81 (84) |
33 (77) |
48 (90) |
| Organization has good relations with the CCM (n=105) |
79 (75) |
24 (86) |
55 (71) |
74 (76) |
33 (75) |
41 (77) |
| Organization has good relations with the LFA (n=105) |
77 (74) |
21 (75) |
56 (73) |
72 (74) |
31 (80) |
41 (77) |
| Organization has good relations with the SRs (n=91) | 85 (93) | 20 (87) | 65 (96) | 81 (93) | 35 (90) | 46 (95) |