Table 3.
Mean values of estimated LD 50 of Yessotoxin in different pathways using 4-level RSP designs
| Pathway | Dose on design level 1 | Dose on design level 2 | Dose on design level 3 | Dose on design level 4 | Mean LD50 (μg/kgBW) | 95% CI of Mean LD50 (μg/kgBW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
4-Level RSP design with binomial outcome, k-adjustment factor and 9 animals at each design level | ||||||
| 01 |
400 M = 3.29 |
581 M = 6.23 |
499 M = 5.01 |
462 M = 4.38 |
457 |
449 – 466 |
| 02 |
400 M = 3.29 |
581 M = 6.23 |
499 M = 5.01 |
536 M = 5.07 |
513 |
510 – 516 |
| 03 |
400 M = 3.29 |
219 M = 0 |
301 M = 1.05 |
338 M = 1.97 |
391 |
389 – 392 |
|
4-Level RSP design with binomial outcome, k-adjustment factor and increasing number of mice with increasing design levels | ||||||
| 01 |
400 M = 1.10 |
581 M = 3.35 |
499 M = 3.9 |
462 M = 4.41 |
464 |
449 – 479 |
| 02 |
400 M = 1.10 |
581 M = 3.35 |
499 M = 3.9 |
536 M = 5.57 |
510 |
501 – 520 |
| 03 |
400 M = 1.10 |
219 M = 0 |
301 M = 0.82 |
338 M = 1.96 |
379 |
374 – 384 |
|
4-Level RSP design with multinomial outcome, k-adjustment factor and increasing number of mice with increasing design levels | ||||||
| 01 |
400 M = 1.10 |
482 M = 2.45 |
499 M = 3.87 |
502 M = 5.06 |
501 |
498 – 503 |
| 02 |
400 M = 1.10 |
482 M = 2.45 |
499 M = 3.87 |
496 M = 4.97 |
490 |
470 – 510 |
| 03 |
400 M = 1.10 |
482 M = 2.45 |
465 M = 3.48 |
468 M = 4.51 |
470 |
432 – 508 |
| 04 | 400 M = 1.10 | 482 M = 2.45 | 465 M = 3.48 | 462 M = 4.41 | 455 | 353 – 557 |
The results are expressed with 95% Confidence interval. M represents the mean of dead mice based on 10,000 simulations on the assigned dose.