Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 25;15:18. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-18

Table 3.

Mean values of estimated LD 50 of Yessotoxin in different pathways using 4-level RSP designs

Pathway Dose on design level 1 Dose on design level 2 Dose on design level 3 Dose on design level 4 Mean LD50 (μg/kgBW) 95% CI of Mean LD50 (μg/kgBW)
4-Level RSP design with binomial outcome, k-adjustment factor and 9 animals at each design level
01
400 M = 3.29
581 M = 6.23
499 M = 5.01
462 M = 4.38
457
449 – 466
02
400 M = 3.29
581 M = 6.23
499 M = 5.01
536 M = 5.07
513
510 – 516
03
400 M = 3.29
219 M = 0
301 M = 1.05
338 M = 1.97
391
389 – 392
4-Level RSP design with binomial outcome, k-adjustment factor and increasing number of mice with increasing design levels
01
400 M = 1.10
581 M = 3.35
499 M = 3.9
462 M = 4.41
464
449 – 479
02
400 M = 1.10
581 M = 3.35
499 M = 3.9
536 M = 5.57
510
501 – 520
03
400 M = 1.10
219 M = 0
301 M = 0.82
338 M = 1.96
379
374 – 384
4-Level RSP design with multinomial outcome, k-adjustment factor and increasing number of mice with increasing design levels
01
400 M = 1.10
482 M = 2.45
499 M = 3.87
502 M = 5.06
501
498 – 503
02
400 M = 1.10
482 M = 2.45
499 M = 3.87
496 M = 4.97
490
470 – 510
03
400 M = 1.10
482 M = 2.45
465 M = 3.48
468 M = 4.51
470
432 – 508
04 400 M = 1.10 482 M = 2.45 465 M = 3.48 462 M = 4.41 455 353 – 557

The results are expressed with 95% Confidence interval. M represents the mean of dead mice based on 10,000 simulations on the assigned dose.