Table 3.
Factors independently associated with inconsistent condom use among entertainers in Quezon City, controlling for individuals nested within establishments (N = 143)
| Variable | Model 1
|
Model 2
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted OR | 95% CI | Adjusted OR | 95% CI | |
| Individual risks | ||||
| Marital status | 3.01 | 1.09–8.30a | 2.68 | 1.03–6.96 |
| Alcohol use | 1.67 | 1.00–2.81b | ||
| Alcohol use (with establishment guest) | 1.04 | 0.63–1.70 | ||
| STI knowledge | NS | NS | 0.60 | 0.37–0.98 |
| Micro-physical risks | ||||
| Establishment type (vs. night clubs/bars) | ||||
| Spa/saunas | 1.40 | 0.36–5.42 | 1.17 | 0.29–4.65 |
| Karaoke bars | 10.95 | 1.97–60.96a | 2.00 | 0.29–13.89 |
| Macro-physical risks | ||||
| Ever forced/deceived into job as an entertainer | 7.16 | 1.85–27.714a | 4.78 | 1.19–19.241 |
| Micro-social risks | ||||
| Contact with manager/owner (daily) | 0.46 | 0.27–0.78a | 0.95 | 0.72–1.24 |
| Followed co-worker’s advice to use condoms with establishment guests | 0.13 | 0.04–0.44a | 0.24 | 0.07–0.75 |
| Micro-policy risks | ||||
| Major knowledge source of HIV/STI prevention— medical personnel/professionals | 0.29 | 0.11–0.77a | 0.51 | 0.17–1.56 |
| Alcohol use with guest 9 establishment type | 1.21 | 1.00–1.46a | ||
NS Non-significant
a
Significant at the P <0.05 level
b
Significant at the P <0.10 level