Table 2.
Probability of Use of Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Treatment, Total Spending by Enrollee and Total Spending by SUD Treatment User Before and After Implementation of the MHPAEA1
| Probability of Use of SUD Treatment (%) |
Change in Value Before and After MHPAEA 2 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2010 | 95 % CI (percentile bootstrap) |
||
| Self-Insured enrollees (N=162,761) |
1.04% | 1.18% | 0.05% | [−0.03, 0.12] |
| Fully Insured enrollees (N=135,578) |
0.70% | 0.79% | ||
| Total Spending on SUD Treatment per Enrollee ($) |
Change in Value Before and After MHPAEA 2 |
|||
| 2009 | 2010 | 95 % CI (percentile bootstrap) |
||
| Self-Insured enrollees (N=162,761) |
36.51 | 52.62 | 9.99 | [2.54, 18.21] |
| Fully Insured enrollees (N=135,578) |
26.58 | 32.70 | ||
| Total Spending on SUD Treatment per User ($) |
Change in Value Before and After MHPAEA 2 |
|||
| 2009 | 2010 | 95 % CI (percentile bootstrap) |
||
| Self-Insured Users (N=3738) |
3,502.41 | 4,453.12 | 607.68 | [−185.71, 1423.13] |
| Fully Insured Users (N=1941) |
3,795.87 | 4,138.90 | ||
Notes:
1
Models adjust for gender, age category and state of residence.
2
A difference-in-differences analysis was used to account for secular trends.